Shades-o-Blue
Member
Given that there are still murderers, thieves, adulterers, and rapists, to list a few, I'd say yup.Given that they're wholly irrational and unsubstantiated, nope.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Given that there are still murderers, thieves, adulterers, and rapists, to list a few, I'd say yup.Given that they're wholly irrational and unsubstantiated, nope.
But where? Where do you intend to take that message? To the first world, where some countries are already dangerously close to dipping below critical mass? Don't you think your message would be better used in the third world?
No, being a pro-abortion, and a pro-depopulation disciple is carnally minded. My view is a slap in the face to all carnally minded.
Given that there are still murderers, thieves, adulterers, and rapists, to list a few, I'd say yup.
No I'm not, as I have faults of my own. I'm not thrusting anyone to hell, am I?but you are at fault in finding arbitrary faults in others to make yourself feel better...
Given that there are still murderers, thieves, adulterers, and rapists, to list a few, I'd say yes.
You haven't any logic.and you want to breed more of those in this world where most of these murderers and thieves come from homes where they were either not wanted or taken care of?
your logic is flabbergasting
No I'm not, as I have faults of my own. I'm not thrusting anyone to hell, am I?
Wrong. It's history repeating itself. There were murderers and rapists 6,000 years ago, and there are murderers and rapists in 2012.That is due to a lack of reason and compassion, and nothing to do with nonsensical scratchings in some book.
Then why isn't it, Father? Why are you harrassing the parts of the world that are already caught in the depopulation frenzy?Responsible, sustainable breeding should be taught in all corners of the globe.
You haven't any logic.
You're trying to put words in my mouth...again. Where in my words have I ever promoted irresponsible breeding?
I'm LDS as well, and don't your words sound selfish & rebellious? Lets see: God commanded us to multiply and replenish the earth, and your response is: I don't "want" to.
What do you say to this?
I do mind. That's why I keep asking you depopulation disciples to take your message to the third world. Why won't you do this?So you won't mind when the world becomes overpopulated, resources are used up and humanity goes extinct? That is what your outlook will lead to.
Perhaps. Where do you propose to take your message?
I do mind. That's why I keep asking you depopulation disciples to take your message to the third world. Why won't you do this?
But where do I say multiply & replenish the earth with reckless abandon? I don't. The word RESPONSIBLY is implied in this message.here...
Then welcome to overpopulation, princessbecause 3rd world countries are mostly...theocratic duh.
Wrong. It's history repeating itself. There were murderers and rapists 6,000 years ago, and there are murderers and rapists in 2012.
Then welcome to overpopulation, princess
But where do I say multiply & replenish the earth with reckless abandon? I don't. The word RESPONSIBLY is implied in this message.
asI don't "want" to.
instead of agreeing with katzpur that that is the responsible thing to do?selfish & rebellious
What if it wasn't within my power to give the unborn the benefit of the doubt?
What if it wasn't even my place to decide if one should be given the benefit of the doubt?
What if I decided that I wanted that person to be free to pursue his own destiny, rather than sieze control of that person's destiny so that I may have power over that person?