What's the term to describe this?

[IndigoChild5559]

Can you find a post number. I don't know who Darwin is.

Then you have a serious, serious gap in your education. Even my very sheltered, highly religious, homeschooled nieces and nephews who believe in creationism know who Darwin is and the basics of his evolutionary theory. Please find an encyclopedia article or watch a documentary on him as soon as you can.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Then you have a serious, serious gap in your education. Even my very sheltered, highly religious, homeschooled nieces and nephews who believe in creationism know who Darwin is and the basics of his evolutionary theory. Please find an encyclopedia article or watch a documentary on him as soon as you can.

Wow. Do you even know what my education is, whether I received a full one, and my childhood to know whether or not Darwin was the most important thing on my list of things to know?

Could you ask why I don't know this information before you judge?

 

[nPeace]

My beliefs can certainly change. No question about that.
I use reason, and endeavor to go with what the evidence strongly supports, in cases where a matter cannot be directly proven.
If direct proof is given, I cannot deny it. I don't see any purpose in doing so. How would doing that benefit me? I don't see how.

You earlier demonstrated that you use your reason to conclude that something which you did not see anyone build, requires you to base your conclusion on prior knowledge.
So when you see anything you consider "not nature", you feel quite sure man constructed it.
So regardless of how complex or simple, man built it.

I also use my reason, based on prior knowledge to reach conclusions.
I explained it to you numerous times Artist, so right now I feel like I am repeating something again and again, and it's as though I didn't.
You are asking the same questions, just slightly adjusted.
So maybe look over what I said, and think about it. Perhaps when you are bored on the internet, might be a good time.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

Wow. Do you even know what my education is, whether I received a full one, and my childhood to know whether or not Darwin was the most important thing on my list of things to know?

Could you ask why I don't know this information before you judge?

You're free to share.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

You're free to share.

Please ask next time and don't assume. Not everyone has the same education (and even in the same country) as other people have.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

Please ask next time and don't assume. Not everyone has the same education (and even in the same country) as other people have.

I'm sorry, but I stand by my remarks, regardless of where you are educated. I'm not saying you are responsible for a poor education. I'm saying that whoever taught you in science did a poor job. If you want to share something that gives more context as to why you don't know who Darwin is, that would be lovely. But it wouldn't change the fact that your science education was poor.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

I'm sorry, but I stand by my remarks, regardless of where you are educated. I'm not saying you are responsible for a poor education. I'm saying that whoever taught you in science did a poor job. If you want to share something that gives more context as to why you don't know who Darwin is, that would be lovely. But it wouldn't change the fact that your science education was poor.

I was in and out of the hospital so I don't remember what was taught in science. It's not something I instantly remember when going through brain surgery and all.

I'm sure some people would take interest in Darwin but that's just not something that's in my head of things to discuss. It doesn't add to paying bills and it certainty not something I need at work. I wouldn't say poor education-at least nowadays, it's probably better than of course back when. Maybe your focus should be on poor education but not me specifically. I wish I could change my childhood but even if I did, science wouldn't be one of the subjects I'd choose to re-take.