ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
I'm tired.
So do you have an actual reason for believing in god that isn't entirely circular (begging the question) or not?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm tired.
I've already answered.So do you have an actual reason for believing in god that isn't entirely circular (begging the question) or not?
Who created everything??? GODS did.
Believing in a God is a belief, a believer do not know everything about God, itctake years of deep study to realize the truth of God and a lot of faith.Who created GODS?
This is just silly. We don't know why things exist and are the way they are. Making up a god or gods, or even GODS, doesn't actually change that, it just moves the question around a bit. God(s) explain nothing - except in a simplistic 'just so' story kind of way.
The soul is a proof of God's existence but atheist deny the existence of a soul precisely because it proves God.
Non sequitur and baseless assertion. Why would a soul prove any god(s)? What reason is there to think a souls exist? And you really should stop pretending that you know how atheists think...
If we see what and who we are, we know God exists through that.
Another baseless assertion.
If a soul exists, it would be clear what it is.
A soul proves God exists because it's light from him and is beyond the physical senses.
And it's obvious we have one because we witness ourselves.
It's not a baseless one, it's clear a soul existing should not be doubted.
Yet another baseless assertion. It is very, very far from clear. I see no evidence whatsoever that souls exist.
Why wouldn't we able to witness ourselves if souls exist?
I'm not begging the question -If a soul is wanting to be intellectual superior to believers that believe in the hidden world beyond five senses, it can deny it's own existence, it's own nature, which is what atheists are doing.
I don't know. But there is still zero evidence that souls exist. I do not witness any souls.
You were begging the question and now you've done it again. You're assuming your conclusion (that souls exist) otherwise an atheist (or any non-believer in souls) wouldn't be denying their own nature.
The baseless assertion is that if even if God exists and souls exists, we would not be able to know or see what either are.
I haven't made that assertion. I have no idea whether souls would be obvious if god and souls existed. All I know is that souls are very far from obvious.
You claim you don't witness, this maybe due to your disbelief and hate towards seeing the truth. I claim I witness my soul and God existing. Which claim is true, everyone has to decide that for themselves or is your claim automatically superior?