Shantanu
Well-Known Member
One cannot live in isolation: we are human beings who socialise. On line socialising is very pleasureable as it gives one knowledge.Who suggested that people have to let go of their egos?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One cannot live in isolation: we are human beings who socialise. On line socialising is very pleasureable as it gives one knowledge.Who suggested that people have to let go of their egos?
Not so easy for us humans to let go of our attachments. Necessary though for seeking out the truth and being wise and enlightened, right?
I don't think they have to but I think it's a worthy goal. I assumed the OP has successfully, "full detached," from his ego judging from the initial post.
Of course it is possible to reach that enlightenment in this life but not easy if one has attachments. We must just live without thoughts.Or any question. This is quandary we find in our human existence; can we reach a level of enlightenment in this life to where questions do not exist?
You're absolutely right. So, I'll ask.I don't assume. In my experience, doing so causes drama. Had I really wanted to know, I would have asked. But I didn't because it's of no consequence to me, and I felt that if he really wanted to share such an accomplishment, he would have done so on his own.
The question that arise is how to explain what happen when the ego is no longer with in what we call the Me Mine, I and so on. It is not possible to understand non self full before the ego has been full detached. But when non self has been understood, it is not easy to explain to those who still cling to a sellf
Why?
Sometimes I ask myself the question, why am I a poster in this Forum: it is to accumulate knowledge: what next? Respond with knowledge.Without the ego, there is no you, no self. If the ego goes, you go too, which is why it cannot go.
Of course it is possible to reach that enlightenment in this life but not easy if one has attachments. We must just live without thoughts.
We meditate for a thought-free lifeGood luck with that...
We meditate for a thought-free life
So now you’ve lived to persons..the one you birthed with had fallen to its death..and now you live the person that you were not in before..that’s good to hear, I can relate..that means you have been born again.What you call “ego death”, I’ve experienced. Looking back, it was a truly horrific state of being. I’m incredibly grateful to be freed from it. I can now, after so long, experience the beauty and fullness of life.
So long as human biology is not transcended to enable one to live in Consciousness that will happen.The idea is to let go one's thoughts and let Consciousness take over.Which always end in more thinking and thoughts.
I can say i have not fully let go of the self, but i have understood what is needed to actually do it, and i do cultivate the part of letting go of the self.Vinayaka put it nicely. Apart from that, why would you go on a forum to tell people you have let go of your ego?
Is it really the 'ego' which religion refers to along with 'self'?The question that arise is how to explain what happen when the ego is no longer with in what we call the Me Mine, I and so on. It is not possible to understand non self full before the ego has been full detached. But when non self has been understood, it is not easy to explain to those who still cling to a sellf
Do you think forums might be a distraction?I can say i have not fully let go of the self, but i have understood what is needed to actually do it, and i do cultivate the part of letting go of the self.
The part that is difficult online is that one must write I. ME. and so on, and then it does sound like the self is still there
To the teacher question i saw, I have been a spiritual teacher for sometimes for those who just started their journey, so if it sounded like i was teaching it was not meant that way in this tread.
I'm glad our posts amused you.
Without ego, this thread would not exist.
Just sayin'
Is it really the 'ego' which religion refers to along with 'self'?
"The ego is the center of consciousness, whereas the Self is the center of the total personality, which includes consciousness, the unconscious, and the ego. The Self is both the whole and the center. While the ego is a self-contained little circle off the center contained within the whole, the Self can be understood as the greater circle"
- Carl Jung
Ego, in and of itself is the balance between Id (reptilian/animal/instinctual) Self and the Superego (inflated, megalomania, delusion of grandeur) Self. A balanced, contained Ego is desired. Where the Ego can fail is when it is not Individuated. It then becomes the reflection of our false Self and not our true Self, a projection of our desires and our shadows. The LHP is not to give up on or surrender the Ego, also not to overly focus on Ego, but to synchronize, synthesize, and expand Ego to reflect our Higher Self.
To the cultivation path? Yes but in same time its one way to gain knowledge and wisdom too. And one very important point, when i go back and look at what i wrote earlier, i can find fault in some of what i did say then, so even in a short time i see some development of new wisdom. And actually seeing develoment in others tooDo you think forums might be a distraction?
Well, I won't stop you gaining knowledge and wisdom.To the cultivation path? Yes but in same time its one way to gain knowledge and wisdom too. And one very important point, when i go back and look at what i wrote earlier, i can find fault in some of what i did say then, so even in a short time i see some development of new wisdom. And actually seeing develoment in others too