Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Judaism (from the Latin: Iudaismus, derived from the GreekἸουδαϊσμός, and ultimately from the Hebrew יהודה, Yehudah, "Judah";According to historians, Moses never described himself or said he was part of "Judaism". Historians also add that the word Judaism came from the enemies of Jews. They said that this "religion" is the religion of Juda's son.
Judaism (from the Latin: Iudaismus, derived from the GreekἸουδαϊσμός, and ultimately from the Hebrew יהודה, Yehudah, "Judah";
An example of an individual being regarded as Jewish exists in the book of Esther, which refers to Morechai as אִישׁ יְהוּדִ Ish Yehudi. Jewish man.
Esther 2:5 There was a Jewish man in Shushan the capital, whose name was Mordecai the son of Jair the son of Shimei the son of Kish, a Benjamite,
She was a Jew. She was Mordechai's cousin.Was Esther a jew or a gentile?
YesDidn't the word "Judaism" come from Judah, who was Jacobs 4th son?
According to historians? Who, for example? And since when did the purported statements (or non-statements) of Moses become the purview of historians?According to historians, Moses never described himself or said he was part of "Judaism".
After the death of Solomon, the nation of Israel broke into two kingdoms: the kingdom of Israel (which had about 10 tribes) and the Kingdom of Judah, which had about 2 tribes (Judah and Benjamin, with Judah being substantially larger). The kingdom of Israel was lost and exiled. What remained were the people of the kingdom of Judah who were known by that collective name "Judah-ites" (Yehudim in Hebrew -- cf the scroll of Esther, chapter 2 in which Mordechai is listed as an "Ish yehudi" a man of Judah who was from the tribe of Benjamin).
Yehudi was appropriated by other languages and became Jude or the like (Juden etc). Juda-ism developed as the term for the belief system of those from this kingdom.
Judah-ism means the cultural practices of the inhabitants of the kingdom of Judah. Jews are the people of Judah, either literally or figuratively. (Yes, the original inhabitants of Judah believed they were descendants of a tribal ancestor by that name, but the term Judaism isn't referring to him, but rather the tribe itself.) The people of Judah believed themselves to be the true inheritors of Israelite culture, especially after the destruction of the northern kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians. I suppose the Samaritans would disagree, but there you go.
Moses is a mythic figure who is important in the culture of Judaism, but he is imagined to have lived in a time long before there were such things as a kingdom of Judah or Jews as such. Similarly, Aeneas was thought to be the ancestor of the Romans, but he was not a Roman himself. Sometimes people refer to all Hebrew peoples as Jews, even in the age of Moses, but that's a casual usage and not strictly correct, as there was yet no land of Judah for them to be named after.
The later antique name for the region was Judea, which more or less means "land of the people of Judah (i.e. Jews)."
It's not a controversial statement. All it means is that he's not a historical figure, in that there's no evidence for him that would count as historical data in an academic sense. Instead he's a figure whose existence is based entirely on the traditional stories within a culture (in this case Judaism and its offshoots). He's no different from Aeneas or Cadmus or Samson in that regard."Moses is a mythic figure" - What makes you say this?
It's not a controversial statement. All it means is that he's not a historical figure, in that there's no evidence for him that would count as historical data in an academic sense. Instead he's a figure whose existence is based entirely on the traditional stories within a culture (in this case Judaism and its offshoots). He's no different from Aeneas or Cadmus or Samson in that regard.
Go to your nearest university and ask a professor of history about this. You will find that the Bible and the Quran are not regarded as historical texts or primary sources. They are evidence of a mythic tradition, not of the contents of that tradition. Put another way, they are evidence that people at the time of writing had stories about Moses, not evidence of any details of Moses's life. As for the Bible and the Torah, those are the same thing in this context, not two different works. And the Quran was written after, using the Bible as a source. That's not evidence of anything in particular.Any academic scholar of history will use any source of historical knowledge. The Bible, Torah, and also the Quran speaks about Moses. We can agree upon that those texts are historical in context. Therefore we can conclude that the person Moses those texts speak about are of the same man.
Now how can you prove that George Washington really existed? Which academic evidence will you use?
The bible isn't great on historical facts. I mean, I can't believe Adam and Eve were real and that's how the world came to be.Any academic scholar of history will use any source of historical knowledge. The Bible, Torah, and also the Quran speaks about Moses. We can agree upon that those texts are historical in context. Therefore we can conclude that the person Moses those texts speak about are of the same man.
Now how can you prove that George Washington really existed? Which academic evidence will you use?
Actually Judaism was coined by the people who despised the Jews. Moses never said his religion was Judaism.
But then later generations liked that term and adopted it.
First of all, what Moses did or did not say does not solely define who we are and what we call ourselves, whether we are going by the name Jews/Yehudim or Hebrews/'Ivrim or the People Israel/Am Yisrael, all of which are valid ways of referring to the same group of people.
Second of all, is there a reason why you have received accurate answers to your post from several knowledgeable and well-educated Jews (and at least one knowledgeable non-Jew also, I believe), and have chosen to summarily reject those answers in favor of something completely historically inaccurate and incorrect?
Have a gut feeling "Moses' religion was Islam" is primary motivation for the OP.
Of course Moses never said his religion was Judaism. Why would he label his religion by the name of one of the 12 tribes? Why would he even call it a religion when it was, for him, simply an exhaustive social code centered around an omnipresent deity whom he encountered day to day?Actually Judaism was coined by the people who despised the Jews. Moses never said his religion was Judaism.
But then later generations liked that term and adopted it.
Judaism or the first covenant of god and man is understood to have started with Abraham not Mosses. But that is scriptural belief.According to historians, Moses never described himself or said he was part of "Judaism". Historians also add that the word Judaism came from the enemies of Jews. They said that this "religion" is the religion of Juda's son.