Spirit of Light
Be who ever you want
Are God a person?Not necessary. To be theist is enough to say "God exists." It is not necessary to add: "God is person."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are God a person?Not necessary. To be theist is enough to say "God exists." It is not necessary to add: "God is person."
It grew from a little speck of dust on the back of that turtle we've heard so much about.We see this world. Where did the world come from? Atheist: I don't know. Theist: from God. Since there is no third option, then God exists.
There is no third option and there never will be, because Atheism cannot be proven. Atheism is the absence of the need for miracles. After all, the more we learn about science, the more we realize that we do not know anything yet. Therefore, the scientific search is endless. And if so, then the "God of the Gaps" will never be killed. There will always be a time and place for miracles. "We can live only in two ways: A. thinking, that there are no miracles, or B. believing, that everything is a miracle" (Albert Einstein).
Since nobody knows the cure for cancer, I could make something up and it would magically become the cure?We see this world. Where did the world come from? Atheist: I don't know. Theist: from God. Since there is no third option, then God exists.
The wording. The wording "God exists, God is not person, God is rock, God is Moon, God is water, God is Zeus,..." means Theism.That is not what I said either. But could a God be non-intelligent? And if so, how would we tell the difference between such God and a rock?
Yes, and I communicate with Elvis every day. He told me how the Earth was created and Blue Suede ShoesThe theists are not making up answer, they talk to God every day and He talks back.
Elvis is not God. So, you have remained Disbeliever.Yes, and I communicate with Elvis every day. He told me how the Earth was created and Blue Suede Shoes
Rubbish, Elvis is a god ... how dare you diss my belief.Elvis is not God. So, you have remained Disbeliever.
We see this world. Where did the world come from?
Atheist: I don't know. Theist: from God. Since there is no third option, then God exists.
The theists are not making up answer, they talk to God every day and He talks back.
I think you might have misunderstood my first post.The wording. The wording "God exists, God is not person, God is rock, God is Moon, God is water, God is Zeus,..." means Theism.
The wording "God does not exist (because there is no proof of God)" means Atheism.
Not necessary. To be theist is enough to say "God exists." It is not necessary to add: "God is person."
You must be a humanistRubbish, Elvis is a god ... how dare you diss my belief.
Then why can't theists come to a one religion, one book, one interpretation consensus if they have this direct line of communication?The theists are not making up answer, they talk to God every day and He talks back.
We see this world. Where did the world come from? Atheist: I don't know. Theist: from God. Since there is no third option, then God exists.
There is no third option and there never will be
the more we learn about science, the more we realize that we do not know anything yet.
The wording "God does not exist (because there is no proof of God)" means Atheism.
The theists are not making up answer, they talk to God every day and He talks back.
The wording. The wording "God exists, God is not person, God is rock, God is Moon, God is water, God is Zeus,..." means Theism.
I find from the God of the Bible because when God sends forth His spirit things are created - Psalms 104:30
New We see this world. Where did the world come from? Atheist: I don't know. Theist: from God. Since there is no third option, then God exists.
RF is not governed or limited by the rules and laws of your Church.
Thank goodness...
Then why can't theists come to a one religion, one book, one interpretation consensus if they have this direct line of communication?
that whatever created the Universe
Then why can't theists come to a one religion, one book, one interpretation consensus if they have this direct line of communication?
There are just naturalistic and supernaturalistic candidates for the origin of the universe
You referred to the god of the gaps. The gaps shrink as man learns
Will you ever learn how atheists define themselves?
If your definition of God as rock makes one a theist, then who isn't a theist?
Hell goers? You are not God , stop condemning others who does not believe exactly as you do.CREATOR creates. How Universe came to be? If it was CREATED, then there is CREATOR - GOD.
Because the satan mixes truth with lies, and so he creates all infinite variety of cults.
No. No naturalistic mechanisms of Universe creation were discovered yet. No plausible naturalistic explanation was given yet. Because there is still the God of the Gaps. Atheists answer: "we do not know how Universe came to be yet."
Theists answer: "From God came Universe to be." Because there is no third answer, and cannot be, then God is proven.
No. Science has discovered, that it knows only 5 % of the matter. There are totally unknown Dark Energy and Dark Matter. Hence, the more Science learns, the more Science does not know.
To learn from hell-goners? No.
The one who has said: "I have lack of belief in God, because there cannot be God, because there is no proof of God."
But one who says: "There is God, but God is wood statue", is called pagan theist, pagan believer in God.