ChronicHalt
New Member
...Take not from literal representation, as words can only convey meaning, and never give truth.
If "God" created man in his likeness, then "God" must certainly be man and would consider SELF the perfect man.
If man was in "God's" likeness, then man would be indistinguishable from "God".
If "Man" has lost "God", the only "Man" then capable of finding "God" is "God", undeniably making that "Man", "God".
If "God" is convinced he is "Man", then "God" is no longer "God"; but can "God" be convinced that he is "Man"? If so then "God" is "Man" and not "God".
I have simply found "God". AT BACKPAGE.COM
If "God" created man in his likeness, then "God" must certainly be man and would consider SELF the perfect man.
If man was in "God's" likeness, then man would be indistinguishable from "God".
If "Man" has lost "God", the only "Man" then capable of finding "God" is "God", undeniably making that "Man", "God".
If "God" is convinced he is "Man", then "God" is no longer "God"; but can "God" be convinced that he is "Man"? If so then "God" is "Man" and not "God".
I have simply found "God". AT BACKPAGE.COM