Separation is just that. It is not supposed to translate into going out of one's way to discourage practice or display of belief.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Where's the Separation of Religion and State?
- Thread starter Faithofchristian
- Start date
Yes, I heard you. I am asking if you are talking about the openly Deist members.
If you're talking about others, could you give me a hint who please.
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Thats right.
But however when Muslims goes into another country, they are to comply to that countries laws that they are entering.
And not that Country comply to Muslims laws.
Let's for say that a person from another country goes to a Muslim country,
Does a person really believe that a Muslim country will comply to that person way of thinking, that, that country should changed their laws just accommodate that person or person's that's from another country.
But this is what Muslims thinks, that no matter what country they enter into, that Country should change their laws just to accommodate Muslims.
Look around the world where ever Muslims are found, they think they have some sorta right to change the laws of that country they are entering.
As in the United States, Muslims for some unknown reason, think their Sharia law over rides the Constitution of the United States.
Not realizing their Sharia law means nothing on the paper it's written on to the people in the United States.
We have our laws and Constitution thats the law of the United States of America.
I'm wary of what Muslim politicians may want myself, @Faithofchristian ... but it is probably wise to wait for actual facts to happen. People should be left with an open path for doing better than we expect of them if at all possible.
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Nope I'm talking about all democrats.they are not Christians.
Now why am I saying this, because whatever God stands against
Democrats are found in supporting.
God against abortions, Democrats supports abortions.
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Thats right, but the evidence is, when people can look at all those other countries where Muslims are and see what is happening there. For instance in Europe and see how now Europe now wants to deport all Muslims out, because Muslims thinking is that their Sharia law over rides Europe laws and standards.
It took some time for Europe to figure it out, that when Muslims entered Europe, the Government wasn't prepared for the Muslims way of thinking, That Muslims tells Europe they must abandon their laws and standards to inforce their Sharia law.
Now Europe going to deport all Muslims out of Europe.
All because Muslims will not comply to Europe's laws and standards.
Thanks for your input, much appreciated.
I don't know the Bible from Who's Boat is This Boat? But I do know that Moses wore a veil when he came down off Mount Sinai.
Oh, no true Christian, huh?
I'm not too sure why you started a discussion on the separation of church and state.
A more honest discussion from your point of view would be around whether a Christian democracy is preferable to a Christian theocracy, with the subtext involving careful requirements for who can be considered 'Christian'.
It came up in a Google search today for "veil symbolism."
Must be true then.
I still prefer to think of you stepping out of a police phone box on Mount Sinai.
lostwanderingsoul
Well-Known Member
And how do you know this if not from the Bible?
lukethethird
unknown member
Overheard discussion in elevator?
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Can you give in what book and chapter and verses where this is written at.
That Moses wore a veil when he came down off Mount Sinai?
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
How can democrats be Christian and support the things that God is against.
To be a Christian, means a person stands with God and not against God.
So how can democrats be Christian, and stand against God.
How does this work.
So...as I said...
I'm not too sure why you started a discussion on the separation of church and state.
A more honest discussion from your point of view would be around whether a Christian democracy is preferable to a Christian theocracy, with the subtext involving careful requirements for who can be considered 'Christian'.
I won't bother asking how Republicans get to have Trump as a leader and keep their Christian credentials. We've already determined you are the arbiter of truth and that the line of Christianity falls alongside US parliamentary lines, which is quite remarkable when you stop and think about it.
It's mentioned here. Women in the Scriptures: The Spiritual Symbolism of Veils
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
That's because Trump stands with Christians and God,
The Republican Party's platform up holds Christians values and God.
Where as The Democarts Partys platform is against Christians values and God.
Had you read the Thread, that would tell a person what the Thread is about.
You realise he paid his pornstar lover to abort their child conceived out of wedlock, right?
Your Christian values, and a Christian God, you mean. Unless the Muslim congresswoman no longers believe in God?
Damn straight. Christian values require a wall to be built to keep out...err...well...Christians. but that's okay, because Jesus taught us to defend what's ours, and fight off the needy. Or something.
No. That would tell me only what people type. Their motivations are sometimes more difficult to discern.
Happily, yours aren't tricky at all.
Also, I've read the thread multiple times, and am happy to directly address any points you might want to make.
So, apologies if my responses are not what you're after. From this side if the screen you appear to have a very limited amount of depth to your argument, and it basically comes down to barracking for 'your team'.
I'm tempted to ask WWJD, but I'm honestly sick of people who are so damn sure they know the answer to that without having to stop and think, so I won't.
Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Out of all due respect
I didn't ask for someone else's opinions.
Which is not according to the bible, Women back during biblical times, women only wore a veil to cover their face was before they got married and that's the only time women would cover their faces. Before they got married.
If it's true that women back in biblical times always wore veils all the time to cover their faces, then why is it in all the pictures of Mary, the mother of Jesus is seen without a veil covering her face.
As with the picture that you given of a woman, her face is not covered by a veil. Her head is some what covered by a head scarf but not her face.
A veil is something that women wore to cover their face with, just before they got married and that's the only time.
Where as the picture that you given, the woman doesn't have a veil covering her face. Just a head scarf that only covers her head and not her face.
I ask you, can you give the book and chapter and verses as to where it's written at in the bible.
Where Moses wore a veil?
Last edited: