Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The opinion of what you have done is of concern to me. What you have actually done is of no concern of mine. I honestly don't care. But if you want to come onto the internet and say some drastically incorrect things and then turn around and claim you have spent your life studying it as a defense I will call you on it. I only mentioned my friends because I do know people that have dedicated their life to study and understanding of evolution and biology.
I don't understand what "the opinion of what you have done" means. It doesn't make any sense. And I have not said "some drastically incorrect things" either. You're not making a lot of sense here. What's the deal?
I wish. No buds yet here.So anyway, the trees came first, yes? I have some mountain ash trees in my garden which produce a lot of berries, and in late September the starlings send a taster to check they are ripe, then a big horde of starlings descends, and it's complete chaos with birds and berries flying everywhere for a couple of days. Great fun to watch! I did wonder about picking the berries to make jam, but decided it was better that the starlings ate them.
Hopefully there are now lots of little mountain ash trees sprouting up in the local area.
Actually your statement didn't make much sense to me so I rolled with it. You said something along the lines of "what your opinion of me is none of your concern" which I think you mean to say that my opinion of you was of no concern to you? Or something. I don't know. Either way it distracts from the rest of the post.
I made no posts that were the opposite of true. Ever.
What does "see bold test for reference" mean? What is bold test?
I highlighted your text and put them in bold print to indicate what I was talking about specifically.
Every single individual is a transitional form. There never was a "transitional species". Species is a term that we, humans, have constructed to describe groups of animals that are compatible and with common traits. In reality, nature doesn't work in steps of species, just individuals of shared gene pools in a point in time, and time changes, and the gene pool changes, and the individuals also change (of course). So, out of the 500,000 and counting fossils we have found, you could say every single one of them is a transitional "species".
Unfortunately, scripture is not even reliable evidence for biology, let alone proof.
If you are relying on scripture for you evidence of biology then you are not engaging in intelligent discussion in the first place.
Ah, denial in its most pure, natural and blatant form.
Three bold empty claims.
[GALLERY=media, 5187][/GALLERY]
I sincerely hope you did not pay anything for your "studying" of evolution.
Your first statement is simply wrong, your second is just plain foolishness.
Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion. At the other extreme is evidence that is merely consistent with an assertion but does not rule out other, contradictory assertions, as in circumstantial evidence. You do not present any evidence, you claim, with no more support than your personal say-so (which without some presentation of credentials and documentation of expertise) is not worth a pile of oats digested and excreted by a bovine.
OK, what are they?
That is a totally unsupported claim that only serves to raise you to the level of Son of Sam. The difference between where you are and actual evidence of reality is clearly beyond your poor powers to add and subtract.
Actually it's sounding like not any that anyone would acknowledge, so it's not evidence.
Without bona fides your opinion is just that, your opinion, nothing more than the belief of one unqualified to comment.
You should be banned from this forum for your behavior.
Really? Please point out what is wrong with my behavior, except that I point out where you are wrong or dishonest and call a spade a spade. Out of sympathy for your position I will change the objectionable word, but remember, transitional species are NOT a matter of any controversy.
