You are much more reasonable than most people I talk to on this forum because most people have little objectivity. It seems like you value facts over belief and that is something more people should start doing.
However, I do not see any of your statements validating your beliefs as having any substance. The fact that your beliefs do not conflict with natural science does not even make them slightly likely of being right. For example, if I believe in an invisible diety who is not detectable by any mechanism we have, and there is no evidence for that person, I have simply constructed that story simply to get around rational analysis and believe in the unproven and the unprovable. What I believe might as well be a joke.
That sort of thing takes evidence. I do have to wonder what is the point with faith. You seem to hold one, but I question the ability of faith to lead to truth. Faith is just believing without seeing and does not seem to lead to truth at all. I do agree that your faith is the most reasonable though.