Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
For those who believe God exists and kicked off the universe, how was he created, and what evidence do you have for your answer? Saying he was always there is no answer.
Well, to flip the question, to those who believe in the big bang (and to be clear I believe in both god and the big bang) where did the singularity that kicked off the universe come from? In every creation theory there is something that must have been there in the beginning with no explanation of where it's from. Religion has God. Science has the singularity.
In truth if you believe in God, and God created everything including Time, God would be a constant. Time does not exist for Him because time is simply something He created, and as such He does not operate within it. Therefore it's not that God was around before the universe. There is no before, or after. We are applying Time, a limiting factor of our Universe to a Being that does not operate within it. It is in that sense that God has always existed.
Imagine that there is no Time, only one singular instance. Everything that has ever happened, is happening and will happen is occupying the same moment in that one instance. Because we exist in Time we experience these things linearly, but it doesn't have to be viewed that way.
Does that apply when people say that the universe was always there- or does flip-flop logic apply here, too?Saying he was always there is no answer.
Does that apply when people say that the universe was always there- or does flip-flop logic apply here, too?
Even if that's somehow correct?Saying he was always there is no answer.
Clearly the universe wasn't always there!
So how did it get there?Clearly the universe wasn't always there!
For those who believe God exists and kicked off the universe, how was he created, and what evidence do you have for your answer? Saying he was always there is no answer.
Well, to flip the question, to those who believe in the big bang (and to be clear I believe in both god and the big bang) where did the singularity that kicked off the universe come from?
Science and nature, indeed our entire universe and the laws that govern it, to me, came from the Prime Mover, an unknowable intelligence, before the Big Bang ever occurred.Does that apply when people say that the universe was always there- or does flip-flop logic apply here, too?
At present, there is no answer. But there is an answer.If you ask why a given nucleus decayed at one particular moment rather than some other, there is no answer.
So how did it get there?
Well, to flip the question, to those who believe in the big bang (and to be clear I believe in both god and the big bang) where did the singularity that kicked off the universe come from? In every creation theory there is something that must have been there in the beginning with no explanation of where it's from. Religion has God. Science has the singularity.
In truth if you believe in God, and God created everything including Time, God would be a constant. Time does not exist for Him because time is simply something He created, and as such He does not operate within it. Therefore it's not that God was around before the universe. There is no before, or after. We are applying Time, a limiting factor of our Universe to a Being that does not operate within it. It is in that sense that God has always existed.
Imagine that there is no Time, only one singular instance. Everything that has ever happened, is happening and will happen is occupying the same moment in that one instance. Because we exist in Time we experience these things linearly, but it doesn't have to be viewed that way.
At present, there is no answer. But there is an answer.
That's quite enough to put the 'spontaneous generation' hypothesis out of consideration.No, there may be an answer.
Quite so.a deity could of course have created it
If you understood the scientific process at all, you would see that there is always the possibility that what is today known as a fact may be changed by new understanding tomorrow.That's quite enough to put the 'spontaneous generation' hypothesis out of consideration.