Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Who do you think will prove or disprove the existence of a deity(ies) and why?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who do you think will prove or disprove gods?
- Thread starter Taylor Seraphim
- Start date
That is not the proper way of dealing with the concept, IMO.
Deities are invariably human creations, and should be treated as such. They exist because we did create them.
Deities are invariably human creations, and should be treated as such. They exist because we did create them.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
I would agree that they are concepts, however perhaps we could eventually prove there where no deities, not because we meant to but cirucmstancly like with string theory.
That is impossible. We create them all the time, perhaps out of a neurological imperative even, so they will keep existing.
Whether they are up to some particularly popular expectations of what they should be is a whole different matter from their existence or lack thereof.
I don't understand what you mean.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
I doubt human beings are even remotely capable of meaningfully approaching either task.
SSDSSDSSD3
The Great Sea Under!
You can only disprove a deity with your own education and study.
vaguelyhumanoid
Active Member
We won't. It's simply not how the gods work.
outhouse
Atheistically
This is already done. BY looking at who defined them and when they defined them, and how they defined them. Just because they refuse this knowledge means little. They refuse facts all the time.
But the reality of the situation is that theist have never proven their claimed gods exist, so WE don't have to prove anything, the burden is upon them, and they have failed.
outhouse
Atheistically
None are trying to disprove, only prove and they have failed by all rights.
There is nothing to observe, therefor nothing exist.
Hasn't this already been done by all three parties, among others?
I guess God(s) need to prove or demonstrate their own existence, ultimately.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
That does not answer the question.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
PS: To anyone who have responded to me personally, I am just asking to see where others stand on this idea.
thevoiceofgod
Active Member
I have proof that our Creator exists because I've been speaking for Him this past 7 1/2 years. However, the proof I have can only be believed by chosen believers. Unbelievers will not believe anything our Creator speaks to them.
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Couldnt figure if it would be the scientist or theolegeon. The former may disprove god but believers probably wont believe it unless someone who studies it pipes in his proof. The philosopher would ask questions about it but finding the answer just leads to more questions. Science cant prove it because by the nature of god, there is "nothing" to proove. The theologan would look at culture, language, a community and indivisual's sense of identity and conclude what holds them together like blood is a word called "god."
The psychologist might figure it out first. But thats not on the list.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Any proof? Or is your god deceptive or you a lair/crazy?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
It won't be proven. I'm not sure if you know what ''proven'' means. We have evidence that informs our ''beliefs''. This can be subjectively labeled as ''proof'', or not //that's arbitrary//,
Last edited:
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
No true proof is subjective.