• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who is right? I give up

Alex22

Member
Evidence of what? Can you be more specific? I'm not quite understanding just what you are asking.

Let me put it in a different way. You seem to be edging in a different subject matter, which is ok. But so that I am non the same page, can you rephrase your question?
Evidence of what? Can you be more specific? I'm not quite understanding just what you are asking.

Let me put it in a different way. You seem to be edging in a different subject matter, which is ok. But so that I am non the same page, can you rephrase your question?

You said Christianity was true, I said prove it. So far you have failed to proved that it is true or that Jesus is a god and the Bible is true.
 

Dropship

Member
There were plenty of people around who didn't like Jesus such as the snooty priests and their lackeys, the Romans, oddball sects etc, but when the gospels were published NONE of them dared come forward to deny Jesus existed because they knew he was TOO BIG to have been a myth, seen and heard by thousands, and that they'd just be making laughing stocks of themselves.

Even the Koran written 600 years later admits he was a miracle man-
[Koran 2.253] "Allah..gave clear miracles to Isa [Jesus] son of Marium [Mary], and strengthened him with the holy spirit"
And even the medieval Jewish Toledot Yeshu [The life of Jesus] confirms his existence.

Likewise I never saw Elvis with my own eyes but am quite willing to accept he existed..:)
 

DNB

Christian
"If having a soul means being able to feel love and loyalty and gratitude, then animals are better off than a lot of humans."

-James Herriot
that's a false predicate - having a soul does not imply having sentiments of love and devotion - let me see you befriend a shark or a mosquito.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Have you ever seen a buddhist cat or hindu owl, what about a camel with a burka on its head?

Religion is but a costume to you? Something to be worn and flaunted, and not lived?

You do not know if that cat is living to Buddha's plans for it or not, or maybe that owl is right on track for what it's Hindu creator had in store for it? What is on the outside isn't what matters, it's what's lived in the heart.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
O the planet a stone mass exists created sits in space.

The planet owns its heavens.

Owns no human argument. Once humans were told humans are not allowed to argue about its history as it is natural.

Natural human science status as a claim by living humans said observation was first.

Science as a practice is a liar.

Pretty basic human advice as who is correct.

Yet the contradiction human want of applying science says otherwise

Which involves civilization over natural family. Trade. Slavery. Greed. Rich and wealthy life destroyers. Known.

By choices only for self artificial status not human family based nor owning agreeing any intention to support natural human life.

Known taught realised warned by humans for humans the natural life human family.

And still today you try to con and coerce life on earth by status to argue and force.
 

DNB

Christian
Just chiming in. Animals have the capacity to be conscious I think. In the garden of Eden was the snake not conscious? It was influenced by Satan.
My dog and cats snuggle up on me, I know they love me.
They don't love you, they cuddle up to blankets and sofas also.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
So do humans.

If science not human first observing is visionary theorising claiming by recorded memories I am correct then it is memory.

He says I saw black holes in human vision theory pretend emerge after planets as the subject a God form collapsed in to a core particle separation.

Memory.

Reasoning as a sun owned very hot space after its mass energy gets burnt out. Cools in vacuum the rest of energy leftover falls away. Equals theory.

In his man science designed past where as a human he said he was personally Satan was as he took his human water removed cloud remassing into a nuclear event.

By his scientist choice.

Today that theory as a human would quantify a human spiritual life could be his new resource.

As he is just referencing human science memories

He knew we lost half support human ground water life into new cloud mass.

He wants in a new machine thesis lightning reactions in cloud mass for electricity. So he says he wants to take our human clouds direct into his machine.

His ark theme ground machine hence says machine metal hole direct made caused by my science choice to a metal pretend God earth core saved....

Earths core natural is already saved.

Machine built saved body his manipulation only. Is not equals to his he theories.

Hole in machine pouring human cloud water inside my machine ark. Human spirit resources as past idealism a human spirit is now a cloud mass.

Instead of above ground life owning it.

Old ark UFO stopped hitting mountain.

His one extra now minus theory as power plant owns ground dust converting is below ground v mountain.

Ark to hit his machine as end to thesis answer. As creating always is given the end.

Reason earth previous Satan life origin by man's machine destruction saw scattered underground particle removal enmasse O to God the earth carpenter tectonic advice.

Plate collapse caused above mass half ark theme core separation opening to equals opened to solid machine core.

Planet core itself. As the sun by mass is not origin it is consumed. Never theories about what is gone in new science.

Invention means my man theory claims I will invent the creation of the body of earth first as particle separation. Tectonic carpenter collapse.

Seeing it first does not own it. God does. Man in science states I want God for a machine reaction. One minus gods destruction.

Why he thinks he is God the creator as a man theist.

Natural earth never owned his theory. He wants to give it to planet earth as his intention real.

Why archaeology found his spatial channel opened snap frozen machine parts deep inside collapsed first earth gone. His first man science all life destroyed Satan. As it never ended in the past first as Jesus.

Jesus by man memory only reformed when clouds cooled remassed. What he ignored as a scientist.

When men of science are one hundred percent man past science memory taught they knew new cloud remassing took the humans life spirit water from us to reform mass of clouds.

A theory science by human intention thinks back over pre recorded human pre past science memories of conversion.

Once it was first sun to earth memories only. As origin first human science theory for practice science. Then it became human sciences owned machine past causes re applied and re remembered.

Modern day science was only ever discussed as science as the old testimonials. No theory beyond it was ever accepted as human science had been outlawed.

There was no excuse for harming life again the teaching.

Greedy human controlled history repeated itself. Still is chosen today.

To not heed any previous lived human experience regarding human nuclear science practices.
 
Top