Why include "pseudo" in that sentence? It seems superfluous.In my opinion, some pseudo Religionists are sadists to the degree that they enjoy the pain of others.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why include "pseudo" in that sentence? It seems superfluous.In my opinion, some pseudo Religionists are sadists to the degree that they enjoy the pain of others.
I've never reported a post, but your repeated statements like that qualify as trolling.You can feel him. But you can't see him. When people are not saved. And they die they get torched day and night. Screaming crying yelling. That tells you in revelation.
Why do you care what people are saying?People are saying God is gay and won't stop claiming that. And says I am wrong to say God is not gay
So what? Is their opinion that important to you? If so, why?Musicfan said:I know but I'm being called a troll
Here are the moderators meeting to decide the fate of a sinner....
Their leader, "The High Sparrow", authorizes the auto da fe.
I'm sorry I offended every one
If I can survive here (just barely), then anyone can.I don't want to get banned on here.
I don't want to get banned on here.
Excessively trusting people should get some kind of warning about this place.@Revoltingest is kidding you. He does that a lot. He seems to think it funny. But then, he eats haggis voluntarily.
And a handsome devil you are.I'm the one sporting the #3:16 on his shirt. I paid extra for it.
I am trying to determine what tone I wish to use in posting on RF. While I 100% agree with the "Liars for Jesus" motto (it's short and pithy), I wonder whether I should prefer instead something more academic (and boring) such as: "Christian apologists seem to me to play fast and loose with the truth" -- and then give examples.Speaking of a God that can care for himself I always wonder about apologists. So many of them simply seem to be "Liars for Jesus". When someone has to lie for his or her God I wonder why they even worship that God.
I am trying to determine what tone I wish to use in posting on RF. While I 100% agree with the "Liars for Jesus" motto (it's short and pithy), I wonder whether I should prefer instead something more academic (and boring) such as: "Christian apologists seem to me to play fast and loose with the truth" -- and then give examples.
Perhaps you can share your thoughts with me.