Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Two constrasting views of the proper relationship between the logical and emotional elements of the human psyche, which may be thought representative of distinct lines of development of western philosophy are dissected with a view to a synthesis.
On the one hand (rational) that emotions, being primitive and bad, should be held in check by the intellect. On the other (romantic) that, though primitive, they are good and should be freely expressed.
These positions are both founded in the same fallacious conception of the relationship between reason and emotion and their respective roles.
The presumed independence of emotion and reason are illusory. Rather than chosing which is right, we should understand how they relate and let them work together.
I think men probably have a higher tolerance, and can ignore things easier than women, (at least it has been in my experience) which would make it seem that men are insensitive, but no, they just have the ability to ignore it because we have "tunnel vision." and women can't because of thier perripherals