Yes it takes two but you have not admitted that tRump demands a one way deal, his way or the highway no room for negotiations.
There's nothing to admit....I'm not privy to their discussions.
I know only that both sides have made demands unacceptable to the other.
And I don't know which is just an initial bargaining position or which is non-negotiable.
Both sides are willing to do great damage to the country in order to win.
Is that something I should challenge you to admit?
I very much admit my biases. I cannot speak for anyone else. I very much decry extreme biases, and a religious agenda of the core of his support as evangelical Christians, which is how he got elected
He also won election because his opposition is a corrupt big government hawk.
One should be careful not to judge Trump's voters solely by what you dislike
about us. Many of us are very not Christian.
We tire of the same old same old presented to us....more wars, more taxes,
more regulation, more imperious politicians who imagine themselves royalty.
Trump was a loose cannon who offered the possibility of change for the better.
Your posts reflect you definitely do care. Your name calling and false generalizations reflect that.
What name calling offended you...is it that I regularly label Trump a "boor"?
But this is ironic, coming from the guy who spells Donald's last name as "tRump".
Note:
I don't care for your repeated dishonest claims about me.
But I'd have not even mentioned it, had you not invited me to make it personal.
You should try just responding to posts, & not attacking the poster.
Things are more peaceful when just discussing issues.
Actually I like McCain, and I am more the middle of the road from a moderate politically active moderate Republican family with a previous Republican Congressman, my uncle.. No place for us now in the Republican Party. I am registered Independent.
I'm from a family of Democrats.
I voted against McCain because he too was another big government hawk.
He was big on tax & spend, but on civil liberty.
It is possible we both have made unwarranted assumption of the other.
I assume that you believe what you post.
Is this unwarranted?
Not very often. In this post your leaning extreme right crowded with fundamentalist Christians.
Yes, I'm a typical Christian fundie in that I've always supported....
- Legal abortion without restriction
- Legal gay marriage
- Legal prostitution
- Transgender use of any bathroom they darn well please.
- Separation of church & state.
- Science in the classroom, not religion.
- Evolution is indisputable fact.
- Get their God off of our money, & out of the pledge.
- Stop the war on Islam.
- Stop the War On Drugs.
- Stop propping up Israel & its atrocities & theft.
- End tax subsidies for churches.
- End legal protections for sexually abusive clergy.
- End religious oaths in government.
If you believe that the above positions are fundamentalist
Christian, then perhaps you don't know them (or me) at all.
It can be confusing.
I find common ground with liberals & conservatives, fundies
& heathens, Democrats & Republicans, capitalists & socialists.
It all depends upon the issue or goal under discussion.
So about labeling....
If one must do it, thoughtfulness is necessary.
