I wouldn't get too excited as the vast majority, correctly, voted - Both... and that is a pretty sad indictment against religion in an of itself.
As long as it is not just religion, I'm content
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I wouldn't get too excited as the vast majority, correctly, voted - Both... and that is a pretty sad indictment against religion in an of itself.
This number seems propaganda level overstated. 500,000 a year for 2000 years?
How was the number reached? Where did you read it?
About 7% of historic wars have been religious in nature (and a significantly lower % of the casualties). This figure would need to be close to 100% to get that number.
Seems fantastical to me.
Don't under play the fact that the option 'both' is leading .I'm glad no one voted religion. It gives me hope in humanity.
(Now all votes will pour for religion!)
It would help to avoid empathy.
Don't under play the fact that the option 'both' is leading .
Do you have any idea how much of the continental USA would become Native territory if the government honored all the agreements we made with the First Nations? And compensated them for damages done after it was stolen, like mining and logging?Now gimme money, food stamps, a free car, and NO taxes!
Hunting season and bag limits no longer apply to me.
I'ts MY land and MY game!
And YOU can pay me rent for where you live and work!
Build me a casino while you're at it so I can rip off you white
people big time all tax free!
This guy came up with 195 million in the last 1000 years, and I think he's being conservative. For example, the article says 20 million native americans, but I've heard figures as high as 100 million.
https://www.reddit.com/r/path%3D%252Fr%252Fatheism%252Fcomments%252F33tofh%252F
And of course one can make good arguments that a certain conflict wasn't "really" in the name of religion. Remember I said in my post I was going to generalize.
But - for the sake of argument - let's say it's more like 400 million not one billion. Does that really make religious violence acceptable?
I think it does, overall. Because it commonly teaches people to put Faith in human authority. Once they have learned to let someone else do their thinking for them, it's easy to get them to go to war or oppress people or any of the many horrible things people do to each other.Although many people take it for granted, I'm not sure there is any rational reason to believe that religions have made us significantly more violent than we would otherwise have been.
Although many people take it for granted, I'm not sure there is any rational reason to believe that religions have made us significantly more violent than we would otherwise have been. Violence is simply part of our nature and we easily find ways to justify violence against the other.
"Good people do good things, bad people do bad things. But to get good people to do bad things takes Religion. "
I would love to know of societies in which children were not brought up indoctrinated in religion. Most religion is very tribal, very "us vs. them". So I don't really think we know to what degree "violence is a part of our nature". maybe, maybe not.
So my answer is that people are the problem.
Or ideology, or politics or money or family or love or power or threat or pride or fear or...
Human society is very tribal and us v them, identity is a central component of existence and identity creates an us and a them. We evolved to be this way (as did the other animals we most closely resemble).
As to whether violence is part of out nature, there are few things in this world that are better supported by evidence.
I personally blame people since at least in the first place they ultimately make the decision, do the act, say the word and most of all choose and follow the religion/ideology/belief system/etc. they follow.