This is an exercise in lack of communication skills. Most humans fail here.
I blame English. The language sucks.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is an exercise in lack of communication skills. Most humans fail here.
I completely agree. I'm a language skeptic too. I'm interested in piecing together the puzzle of what people mean. The words are just clues. Sometimes words are just slogans memorized by rote to protect the ego. Finding meaning in there often calls for a sledgehammer approach.
Oh pish, the proper word for "cloud" is "big fluffy bunny looking cotton candy stuff in the sky".
"Fluffy bunny?" I once saw a cloud that looked like a giant raven spreading its wings, and half the clouds I see always look like dragon heads. "That's no ordinary rabbit!"
They are either "persuasive" or "not persuasive."
or "just bluddy stupid."
I think the technical term would be "horribly non-persuasive."
A sub-category of "not persuasive".or "just bluddy stupid."
Im at risk of seeming like a simpleton but I ask anyway: Why are you interested in debating? Ive never seen a website with so many opportunities for debate. The nature of debate is disagreement and not necessarily to resolve it. So why do you go looking for debate?
Completely off-topic validation & vindication of your well-done, self-described "amateur research"Heh. Fun semi-off-topic fact: the word "cloud" was originally a metaphorical analogy
Unfortunately not many seem to realise the principle.
Im at risk of seeming like a simpleton but I ask anyway: Why are you interested in debating? Ive never seen a website with so many opportunities for debate. The nature of debate is disagreement and not necessarily to resolve it. So why do you go looking for debate?
You dont have to respond... its not a confrontational topic. There are greater forums on this website other than the debates.
I have trouble responding to this topic further because Im aware how mundane the question is. However the principle of the question remains strong, and we got some interesting responses also. Unfortunately not many seem to realise the principle.