• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Aren't you a Libertarian?

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Here is a link to the Libertarian platform.

https://www.lp.org/platform/

Sorry to those who don't like to go to links but it's a bit much to post the entire platform here.

I'm just curious what specifically folks dislike about the libertarian platform that would cause people to vote against a Libertarian.

I suppose the main concern would be a lack of political power of the party but wouldn't that mean you are more concerned about political power than principle?

a1e8988e2a2f49f7f4ff185c83700d2b.jpg
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Because.....oh....wait.....I am!
But I can think of reasons for most people not to be one.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I find libertarianism attractive in some ways, but the deal breakers for me are:

(1) that I believe it would further rule by oligarchy.

(2) That it lacks a social conscience.

(3) That it is impractical and was a disaster when it was partly implemented in Chile. The suffering it caused the poor and middle class was incredible. One of the libertarian economists behind the experiment found the results so indefensible that he simply refused to speak about what happened for the rest of his life because he couldn't justify it.
 
Last edited:

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Not once did their platform mention offering assistance, welfare, or protection to the socially and economically vulnerable. It is a very bootstrap system that allows the powerful to continue to stampede over others. No thanks.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
.....system that allows the powerful to continue to stampede over others. No thanks.
You must've known that I'd respond with the Democrat & Republican foreign policy alternative...

Ya know, you can be a Libertarian, yet still support many social programs,
eg, drug rehab, mental health care. (Those are things which enhance a
libertarian themed society.) Join me....influence the party!
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm just curious what specifically folks dislike about the libertarian platform that would cause people to vote against a Libertarian.
Those who suggest any pure and consistently applied economic model are in extremis, because all economic systems are self destructive. Therefore you cannot have a purely libertarian economic system that works continuously. You must change economic models or your economy stagnates, no matter what system you choose. Trickle down, socialist, libertarian....it matters not. All of them work temporarily, but nothing works in the long term. Look at the EU. Its only been around for 60 years, and its having to change form. Look at any system capitalist or otherwise. They always fail and have to change.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Not once did their platform mention offering assistance, welfare, or protection to the socially and economically vulnerable. It is a very bootstrap system that allows the powerful to continue to stampede over others. No thanks.
I'll respond a 2nd time with some observations....
Few agree with everything in any given party's platform.
Yet despite differences, they find one worth joining.
It appears that the underlying drive is....
Does the party steer the country in the direction you'd like better than the others?
If so, it might be more attractive than being an independent.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I'll respond a 2nd time with some observations....
Few agree with everything in any given party's platform.
Yet despite differences, they find one worth joining.
It appears that the underlying drive is....
Does the party steer the country in the direction you'd like better than the others?
That's tough because one can make an argument that what we have now does the exact thing I am critiquing the Libs for. But, at a high level on paper, I prefer a strong, centralized form of government that provides universal necessities to those who can't otherwise provide it themselves. I also find capitalism, in the form we see it right now in the US, as destructive and not sustainable.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That's tough because one can make an argument that what we have now does the exact thing I am critiquing the Libs for. But, at a high level on paper, I prefer a strong, centralized form of government that provides universal necessities to those who can't otherwise provide it themselves. I also find capitalism, in the form we see it right now in the US, as destructive and not sustainable.
Oh, well....at least I had fun trying to recruit you.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am a left-libertarian, and when charted out I'm very close to Gandhi on it.
There's no such thing.
It's the left's love of powerful government which makes "left libertarian" an oxymoron.

Caution:
This is intended to provoke discussion.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Oh, well....at least I had fun trying to recruit you.
I'm glad you enjoyed it! Remember, I am an idealist that believes taxes should be paid back to the populace in the form of services and welfare. It would appear the Libertarian position is by dramatically reducing taxes due to a smaller government, we can then afford it ourselves. I will say that I am not 100% against it, I just have trust issues in that I do not think it would work out that way. But I could be wrong.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm glad you enjoyed it! Remember, I am an idealist that believes taxes should be paid back to the populace in the form of services and welfare. It would appear the Libertarian position is by dramatically reducing taxes due to a smaller government, we can then afford it ourselves. I will say that I am not 100% against it, I just have trust issues in that I do not think it would work out that way. But I could be wrong.
I see it similarly, ie, the cost of social services would be reduced if taxation were less.
Declaring fewer wars (either out of rage or generous intent to fix others) wouldn't hurt either.
 
Top