Everyone has their intuitions, and a whole lot of people want to officiate their reasons as the only reasonable way. I don't think that life is that simple. Agnosticism seems to be the most honest response to reality.
Every individual is going to have their unique take on reality and their own unique intuitions. Even facts are subject to amendability, and have their weaknesses.
It's amazing to me that so many disdain general religious patterns of thinking and believing. I don't think people would be religious whatsoever if there wasn't something substantive and effectively worthwhile about some of it.
I have my own unique religious perspectives of my own but I don't subscribe to any of the religions out there.
For me there is power and freedom in a spiritual perspective. And considering that all humans start from scratch and are not all knowing of reality, I find value in exploring spirituality.
I don't think anyone speaks the natural language of reality. We all take our best estimation of it.
Obviously the most effective tool of man's reasoning and observation is science. But there is plenty of unknowns that leave room for philosophical efforts to understand and explain reality. I think philosophy and science are inescapable partners. Everyone does philosophize, and religion to me is apart of philosophy.
Some of the most vehement opposers of philosophy have a lot of philosophy in their facts.
Finally I think explanations are never complete, and everyone falls way short of absolute explanatory power. My convictions lead me to religious philosophical seeking. There will always be things beyond observation, and explanation.