Why Atheists Don’t Really Exist

[blü 2]

It always comes down to emotions
aka self indulgence

I suspect religious belief commonly starts with acculturation. It did in my case ─ at 14 I was a confirmed (in the technical sense) Pisco.

 

[paarsurrey]

" Why Atheists Don’t Really Exist "

by Logic and reason.
Atheists also largely accept the findings of science, which has its own methodology.

paarsurrey : Science does have a Methodology, but Atheism people don't have any Methodology, please, right?
paarsurrey: Had the Atheism people been reasonable, they would have realized their existence is unreasonable and or perhaps fake, please?
They only criticize other people and never applying it to their "Atheism" on the same standard , does criticism of others make one's own existence possible, please, right?

Regards

 

[Valjean]

" Why Atheists Don’t Really Exist "


paarsurrey : Science does have a Methodology, but Atheism people don't have any Methodology, please, right?

Didn't we go over this a month or so ago?
A methodology is a method or technique of research, or a way of doing or studying something. Atheism doesn't involve research, and doesn't do anything, so the word wouldn't even apply to it.

paarsurrey: Had the Atheism people been reasonable, they would have realized their existence is unreasonable and or perhaps fake, please?
They only criticize other people and never applying it to their "Atheism" on the same standard , does criticism of others make one's own existence possible, please, right?

Regards

Reasonable? Reason is the very foundation of atheism. It's what our skepticism is based on.

How is our existence unreasonable? What does that even mean? And Fake? Like we're some sort of computer simulation, whilst believers are not?
Please define fake and unreasonable, because I don't understand what point you're trying to make.

We generally criticize false, unreasonable or illogical ideas. We explain how and why certain ideas and conclusions are unevidenced or illogical. We welcome the same criticism of our ideas, but this is difficult, because we have no ideas or beliefs or doctrines. This is what defines us as atheists. We're simply withholding belief in God till someone produces some evidence that He exists. We ask for evidence again and again, but all we get are assertions and illogical arguments.

It is the job of the one making a claim to support that claim. It is not our job to defend anything, because we've made no claims to defend. We simply lack belief because we see no real, objective evidence to support belief, and believing in something without evidence is irrational, right?

Regards.

 

[Audie]

Didn't we go over this a month or so ago?
A methodology is a method or technique of research, or a way of doing or studying something. Atheism doesn't involve research, and doesn't do anything, so the word wouldn't even apply to it.

Reasonable? Reason is the very foundation of atheism. It's what our skepticism is based on.

How is our existence unreasonable? What does that even mean? And Fake? Like we're some sort of computer simulation, whilst believers are not?
Please define fake and unreasonable, because I don't understand what point you're trying to make.

We generally criticize false, unreasonable or illogical ideas. We explain how and why certain ideas and conclusions are unevidenced or illogical. We welcome the same criticism of our ideas, but this is difficult, because we have no ideas or beliefs or doctrines. This is what defines us as atheists. We're simply withholding belief in God till someone produces some evidence that He exists. We ask for evidence again and again, but all we get are assertions and illogical arguments.

It is the job of the one making a claim to support that claim. It is not our job to defend anything, because we've made no claims to defend. We simply lack belief because we see no real, objective evidence to support belief, and believing in something without evidence is irrational, right?

Regards.

As in, "I don't believe that ridiculous stoty."

 

[Valjean]

As in, "I don't believe that ridiculous stoty."

Yes, but I feel it's only proper to explain why it's ridiculous.
Is that militant, insulting or aggressive?

 

[Audie]

Yes, but I feel it's only proper to explain why it's ridiculous.
Is that militant, insulting or aggressive?

Anything is to the oh so hyper sensitive.