Why Blame???

[Alien826]

The Durham report shows how the Hillary Clinton campaign blamed [1] former President Trump for Russian Collusion to distract everyone from her illegal e-mail server, that had been used for influence peddling. She destroyed the hard drive in spite of being told by subpoena to present it as evidence; used Bleach Bit software and hammers. Blame [1] is often used by crooked people to take the pressure off themselves. She got away free and the blame game [1] was applied to Trump to avoid justice.

The next question is why did so many people believe her blame scam [1]? Honor among thieves. The Democrats party blames [1] the white Christian male for all the problems of the world, thereby justifying stealing and kick backs, for all their voters, who want a free ride, using some time warped blame game [1], instead of having to compete in the free market. Even their allies in the press and media went along with the blame game [1], since they benefitted with more viewership and career boosts; circle of thieves.

I am blaming [2] this circle of thieves, because they have yet to see any justice for all the injustice they did to others; thou shall not bear false witness. The Nazis did same thing to the Jews, and the Democrats took a chapter from their playbook.

What should be the penalty for the circle of thieves, since the logical end to their blame game [1] is not pretty; blame [1] the parents for the manipulation of teachers from the circle of thieves. Attack and blame [1] political opponents who seek justice? Make the justice department an injustice department like their idols the Nazis who justified atrocity with the blame game.

[1] - Bad blame, left wing person.
[2] - Good blame, right wing person.

All together now ... "Right wing good, left wing bad!" (Repeat until convinced).

 

[dybmh]

What I was trying to get at was that when blaming someone, we are ignoring one half of the equation.

As an example: yes, that person murdered that other person, but what are the circumstances, background, life history, etc that lead to that person viewing that (murder) as a viable option.

OK. I see what you're saying. I agree that it's always good to look at the circumstances. Maybe you're right that blame interfere's with this. I'm not sure that it does. But, it's matter of degree. Like you said, has the blame replaced reason and critical thinking? If you are saying it's only blaming if reason and critical thinking are vacant, then, yeah, I agree. Blame is no good. But I don't see it that way. I think that would be a extreme version of blame. And almost anything in an extreme is harmful.