Nimos
Well-Known Member
Well I don't think your question solves it. Because we know some people have done bad things, lets just go with the burn people at the stake thing. But if what he is saying is that religious people gets their morality from God or their religion, then clearly these should not be capable of doing such thing and therefore I assume that those that burn people at the stake must therefore be atheists, or religious people which doesn't follow the morality of God?@Nimos, in my mind it really is quite simple: good people will do good, whether or not they believe in God. That's what it means to be a good person. And bad people, as we have seen throughout human history, regardless of their religious beliefs, will do what they will. How else could you suppose that a believer in an all-forgiving God could think it right to burn people at the stake? And it was a whole church that did that!
Do you see the issue then?
Either the atheists for some reason are burning people at the stakes or religious people don't really get their morality from God, or are simply able to not follow it whenever they chooses, but then what is the difference between them and atheists?
Except based on what he write, is that atheists are able to show true compassion. But atheists do whatever they will regardless of their religious belief, both if its good or bad. So what is the difference, between religious people and atheists? What is the point of talking about a lesson and pointing out that atheists in particular can do kindness etc. without a believe in God, when religious people can do the exact same thing.
This becomes very messy quickly, if we are to go down that route I think.