call-u-twice
Member
If all according Advaita Vedanta there is no seperation between us and the whole when we come to realization why did we become separated in the first place and is not this illusion also bart of Brahman?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If all according Advaita Vedanta there is no seperation between us and the whole when we come to realization why did we become separated in the first place and is not this illusion also bart of Brahman?
If all according Advaita Vedanta there is no seperation between us and the whole when we come to realization why did we become separated in the first place and is not this illusion also bart of Brahman?
Because at that first place, "We ourself" (god) decided to realize the sepration.If all according Advaita Vedanta there is no seperation between us and the whole when we come to realization why did we become separated in the first place
Yes this illusion also bart of brahman.and is not this illusion also bart of Brahman?
What I am wrestling with, and cannot for the life of me understand, is why Brahman needs to "experience" or express itself. Brahman is beyond all expression and attributes. If we ourselves are Brahman, why do we choose or need to experience our own creation? And what is the purpose of creation and māyā? Recreation and play of Brahman as Shankaracharya said? I can't get my head around this. For that reason, and I know I'm no scholar, Advaita makes no sense to me.
What I am wrestling with, and cannot for the life of me understand, is why Brahman needs to "experience" or express itself. Brahman is beyond all expression and attributes. If we ourselves are Brahman, why do we choose or need to experience our own creation? And what is the purpose of creation and māyā? Recreation and play of Brahman as Shankaracharya said? I can't get my head around this. For that reason, and I know I'm no scholar, Advaita makes no sense to me.
It changes the view of things that you see all around you, and it gives the ability to stay away from this dustbin (body) after death, and before death too.If all is no separation between us, then does the realization of that change anything?
I would say that your struggle is healthy and is perhaps an important part of our journey towards moksha/nibbana. It is in the very nature of Brahman to be unknowable until we reach enlightenment and this need for differentiation is one of many questions that I, for one, have yet to understand.
Blind adherence to any spiritual or philosophical tradition does no-one any good so I always keep in mind Buddhas injunction to only pay heed to that which we have gone out and proved for ourselves. at the same time, however, I never dismiss that which I haven't experienced as this may come in time. It works for me.
It´s the eternal question. It´s hard to know why.
Maybe there is no reason, maybe if the right conditions are there we start to manifest. It´s really hard to know what is going on.
But I see no better explanation to what we are than Science and Advaita. I know that I´m here so something must have happened to have gotten me here.
Maya
Because at that first place, "We ourself" (god) decided to realize the sepration.
And at same time, "We ourself" (god) decided to realize the oneness after spending some time in sepration.
Who planned this game ?
We ourself, or God, at that first place.
I think the important point you raised is to not try to understand. This does not mean that understandings don't open to you on your path, but that to try to penetrate it with the mind is to place that mind in the position of God. It is like trying to fly with your feet. Higher mind informs lower mind. The quest is not to understand, but to find higher mind.
One cannot choose oneness after stepping into separation, Because.. both sepraration and re-oneness where decided.. before all this beganed, ..or before the separation, ..or at first.Greetings chinu!
I was wondering, if we did choose to realize separation at first, then is it wrong to prefer "oneness" over "separation"?
If all according Advaita Vedanta there is no seperation between us and the whole when we come to realization why did we become separated in the first place and is not this illusion also bart of Brahman?
I'm just sticking my head in and saying 'yeah, that', like only I would. :yes:fractals fractals fractals