For all the ex-Christians on here, I'm curious as to why you left your religion. This is, by no means, meant to attack Christians for their beliefs. I'm just curious, that's all.
Christianity, I left for many reasons. First of all lets start with translations, the English bible as we know it is only about 5 times removed from the original Hebrew text. What this means is that the book Christians trust in was very poorly translated from Hebrew to Latin then to Greek them back to Latin then back to Greek then to English.
Every time it was translated a group decided what it was trying to say even if they were off in left field that is what went down on paper.
What did God say was scripture?
The Towrah, Prophets, and writings (psalms).
What did God (YHWH) (yod hey waw hey) (Yahowah) say to know how to identify his word and his instructions?
He said not a jot or tittle would fade from his word, jot's and tittle's are only found in one language HEBREW! Not Greek, not Latin.
Question?
So if that is the case and YHWH said this what does this mean for the New Testament?
It was not preserved in Hebrew so is it God's word? NO!
Now let's talk about Jesus.
The j is only 5-6 hundred years old it was originally written iesus. King James was King iames google it. There is absolutely nothing Hebrew about the name Jesus.
Latin
Iesus
Ie in Latin is (that is) or simply the
Sus in Latin is (pig sow swine)
Iesus is the pig, what are you not supposed to eat? Pork!
Has nothing to do with a plate of pork chops but has everything to do with reading and mentally digesting the writings of the pig.
What did YHWH say about the truth?
It would be FREE! Without Charge!
What did YHWH say about identifying falsehood?
They would ask for 10%
Well doesn't that just describe every church?
What was a tithe anyway???
Food and clothes for the Levites!!
Had nothing to do with money!!
So you ask well why don't they correct the English translations?
MONEY!!
A book the doesn't sound like the King James Bible isn't going to sell very well is it?
God's word is preserved as he said it would be. We have the masoretic text and the Qumran scrolls (DSS) they are 99.9% the same. Not that it will do most people any good, the reason is if you buy the DSS (Dead Sea Scrolls) off the shelf it is just as corrupt as the kjv. If you are not willing to do translations yourself or know someone that truly does them because they want the truth then good luck with that search.
You want to trust a book that removed YHWH's name seven thousand times. Btw that is what blaspheming his name really is.
The New Testament has plagerisms from Euripides Greek play Baccus ( a play about demons). This also involves Paul the false apostle. Paul is named by name in Habakkuk when properly translated as a warning ( Sha'uwl ) his real Hebrew name. In Hebrew the word She'owl (the place of seperation from God) and Sha'uwl are written the same way, when translating you have to see if a place or person is being talked about to know how to pronounce it. So Paul and the place of seperation are the same word in Hebrew.
Strongs 1167, 1168, 1168a
The LORD satans English name, why would translaters use this name / title for YHWH?
The list goes on I could write a book about why I left but this is enough. This is my opinion. On the few points I shared.