Why do scientists want to find the end of universe ?

[rational experiences]

If you sit on a planet of stone, and claim you see earlier, you would be lying.

Reactive as known logically to science on Earth is that highest exists right now, it is taken and converted by the forming of a radiated space, or a hole to pass a reactive higher mass through it to convert it into a state of lower form.

Space would demonstrate reactive forces of change, owning no beginning or any end.

Science as a human for a formula and design imposes a beginning and an end.

Space he said was a non measurable body who if you tried, meaning self imposed self a Number factor to space it would be an infinite, never ending number count not giving an end result, a factor. How relativity was once taught.

Machines as reactions therefore open within the fusion mass that they force change a hole and a space, inside of a machine with mass being changed. What they claimed was relative study of spatial cause...to force change by conditions involving space and nothing in space.

Earth never owned the nothing in space of its mass fusion, otherwise we would just be floating in space without living on Earth.

We live as a conscious self by age, which is living within a burning out light gas that is cooled. Age does not define measure, it is a cause of living as a bio form inside of a radiating gas mass. Therefore can you cannot apply an age in space, for a lot of the bodies you discuss do not own gas light, the cause for aging.

 

[chinu]

At last!
I thought that somebody would explain that sooner than post 19!

Astronomers aren't looking for the end of the Universe because it hasn't reached there yet.....
Astonomers are looking as far back as they can to see as close as they can to the BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE!

@chinu ..... you've got it the wrong way round.

Oh!
Beginning of the universe NOT end. Okay.

“Jesus” told in beginning was the “word”

They are trying to find that “word” ?

 

[blü 2]

Is God sitting there at the end ?
or, there's some reason else which force them to do so ?

Which end do you say they're looking for?

 

[chinu]

The question does not make sense to me.

You replied, just to inform me this ?

 

[oldbadger]

Oh!
Beginning of the universe NOT end. Okay.

OK....

“Jesus” told in beginning was the “word”

They are trying to find that “word” ?

Nah! Jesus never said that.
The Apostle John said that!
John said lots of stuff, chinu.
Apostle John had about as much idea about the beginning as our Dolly Duck has.

 

[PruePhillip]

No, how come it is religion?

Because religion deals with values and meaning.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Because religion deals with values and meaning.

So if you have values and meaning and are not a-values and a-meaning, you are in some sense religious?

 

[PruePhillip]

So if you have values and meaning and are not a-values and a-meaning, you are in some sense religious?

You can have values without religion, but religion is a depository of values.
Science is a very material thing.

 

[stvdv]

Is God sitting there at the end ?
or, there's some reason else which force them to do so ?

why-do-scientists-want-to-find-the-end-of-universe?

The mind caught up in its own trap of logic, questions 'why', invents a 'why' and a 'wherefore' to satisfy itself, conveniently ignoring the inconvenient questions that still haunt an intelligent mind.

 

[sun rise]

You replied, just to inform me this ?

You asked me a question. I assumed you wanted an answer. This post seems to indicate that your "question" was not a question but a statement with a question mark at the end.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

Is God sitting there at the end ?
or, there's some reason else which force them to do so ?

Chinu: scientists are by nature extremely curious people. They are hungry for knowledge based on empiracle evidence. They thrive on learning about the natural world. It really has nothing to do with finding God, who is omnipresent and has no location. It's about just seeing what is out there and if it is different or the same and why.

 

[chinu]

Chinu: scientists are by nature extremely curious people. They are hungry for knowledge based on empiracle evidence. They thrive on learning about the natural world. It really has nothing to do with finding God, who is omnipresent and has no location. It's about just seeing what is out there and if it is different or the same and why.

You mean, scientists aren't interested in God JUST because he's omnipresent and has no location ? No. I don't think so.

That because, scientists DON'T believe in the idea of GOD being omnipresent and having no location. They reject this idea and continue their search about beginning/end of the universe.

You are right. Scientist are hungry for knowledge that is based on empirical evidences and the REJECTION of God idea being omnipresent and having no location proves that still they want to search God, or something God-like in their own way.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

You mean, scientists aren't interested in God JUST because he's omnipresent and has no location ? No. I don't think so.

That because, scientists DON'T believe in the idea of GOD being omnipresent and having no location. They reject this idea and continue their search about beginning/end of the universe.

You are right. Scientist are hungry for knowledge that is based on empirical evidences and the REJECTION of God idea being omnipresent and having no location proves that still they want to search God, or something God-like in their own way.

Well it all depends on the scientist. Unlike their unifying interest in exploring creation, scientists are very diverse when it comes to the idea of God. Some are Christians or Muslim rwhatever. Many are deists. Many are agnostics. Some are atheists.

The point was tht their exploration of the expanse of the unverse to the fullest extent is motivated by sheer curiousity of the natural world -- and that is something all scientists share.