what are your personal issues with Islam and why the continuing issues regarding Islam.
I don't think mine are all that remarkable;
@YmirGF might as well be talking on my behalf on his earlier post in this thread.
But it is always useful to put things on one's own words, so here it is:
1. Islaam purports to be a religion, even as it discourages the critical thinking that it would need to become one.
2. It teaches reliance on
both scripture
and a particularly crippled version of Abraham's conception of God to the detriment of many things, first of all actual religious matters.
3. Its moral system is both sorely outdated and mightly hindered by an actual refusal to learn better as time goes by (because the Qur'an is decreed to be eternal, supreme and unchangeable) to a level that makes the Christian Bible feel progressive and accomodating by comparison.
3.1 And because its values are so tribal in nature, it literally forbids itself from respecting LGBT+ subject matters, divergence of conceptions of the Sacred, and disbelief in god-concepts.
4. It is also, frankly, clearly conductive to mediocrity of thought, no doubt to a large degree because it is so insistent on limiting itself to what can be put as a function of scripture and of its extreme monotheism.
4.1 One of the most apparent manifestations of that mediocrity is its complete failure to conceive, let alone coexist peacefully, with rather simple religious ideas such as henotheism.
4.2 An even more serious manifestation is its impressive failure as a moral guide. Islaam teaches to value obedience, mutual support and fear. It falls short of teaching paranoia and violence, but it also falls just as short as teaching
better than paranoia and violence.
4.3 Quite ironically, those very same serious flaws cripple the doctrine with such intensity that it ends up supported, protected and improved upon by most anyone who does not have a very good awareness of its actual doctrine, even as it keeps attempting to take refuge into allegations of misrepresentation of its doctrine.
4.4 Which is a major reason why my opinion of Islaam nosedived so much in so few years. Islaam has 1400 years of history and a literal billion of living nominal adherents, and even so its apologists, even supposed sages with various degrees of fame and good reputations in some circles, have such a hard time dealing with even basic questions and mild questioning and criticism that it is difficult to imagine that
any community would be worse off without Islaam than it is with it. It is actually painful to compare and contrast Muslim thought with, say secular or Hindu thought. It feels like six year old children attempting to compete with mature adults without even realizing their own limitations.
In short, Islaam is a poor doctrine, obsessed with Ibrahim's brand of monotheism, with crippled or non-existent theology, that acts as a powerful and oppressive distraction, getting in the way of people that would otherwise be likely to develop critical thinking and meet actual religious doctrine. At the same time, it is also (and by design) remarkably fertile ground for politically regressive ideas that encourage violence and inconsequence.