Why is it called "evolution vs creationism"? This implies that creationists dont believe in passing on of traits, adaptation, a finches beak changing its shape across several generations depending on environment. But creationists DO accept these things. Wouldnt a better title be " creationism vs the belief that new traits/ things materialize out of nowhere"?
This post is a classic example of why the ancient Biblical view of Creationism is rejected by far the overwhelming majority of scientists. Unless you give a better explanation you are indeed rejecting evolution.
No like my view which is roughly Theistic Evolution where Creation by God is by natural laws and processes, and there is haromony between the science of evolution and all sciences, and no conflict. IS THIS YOUR VIEW?