outhouse
Atheistically
did find this from the link above.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And of course, (just adding to your point) some people do eat cat.
China and Korea are nations that currently consume cat, and probably some other places.
Maybe the taste of cats is good but for others it is nasty,but still the question is valid and which is.
Have we evolved to taste foods as to be delicious ?
I already told you we evolved with these traits.
So by random mutation and it was fixed.
Are we talking about science here or just a guesswork,in other words do you accept evolution as random mutations & natural selections just blindly similar to the creationists that believe it to be planned by God instead.
FearGod said:How you can explain it by random mutation and natural selection?
Theistic evolution is not random, it has been directed by God over millions of years.
Michael Behe, Ph.D., biochemistry, says:
"For example, both humans and chimps have a broken copy of a gene that in other mammals helps make vitamin C. ... It's hard to imagine how there could be stronger evidence for common ancestry of chimps and humans. ... Despite some remaining puzzles, theres no reason to doubt that Darwin had this point right, that all creatures on earth are biological relatives. The Edge of Evolution, pp 712.
Do you agree with Behe? He is a Christian.
I do not have any idea why so many theists attack Charles Darwin since when he wrote "On the Origin of Species," he was a theist, not an atheist. When he discovered that all life forms are related, I assume that he was very surprised about why God took so long to create many life forms. An omnipotent God would not have to take that long to create life.
FearGod said:Yes I believe that creation evolved with the supervision of the creator.
Then you already know how humans acquired a taste for food, so why did you start this thread?
What about the possibility that aliens started life on earth?
How it improves survival chances.
We eat to survive,thats it,then why it made enjoyable.
if random mutation & natural selection,then i don't see a delicious food is necessary for survival as feeling hungary is enough to look for something to eat.
Same reason there's physical pain and physical pleasure.
Touch something that's harmful = feels pain = possibly dangerous = don't touch again.
Tastes something that's bad = bad taste = possibly poison = don't try to eat again.
Good and bad taste increases our chances of picking healthy foods over bad foods. Note I said "increases our chances" so you don't nitpick and say that some good things taste bad and vice versa.
So by random mutation and it was fixed.
Are we talking about science here or just a guesswork,in other words do you accept evolution as random mutations & natural selections just blindly similar to the creationists that believe it to be planned by God instead.
It's observable. No need to blindly accept anything.
For the record, natural selection isn't random.
FearGod said:What makes you to think so ?
i know natural selection isn't random but mutation is.
Eating food for hunger is equal to.. Man eating the food.
Eating food for taste is equal to.. food eating the man.
Its up to one to choose whatever.
Ah! but you break your promise for giving me frubal.मैत्रावरुणिः;3451966 said:Namaste,
Out of all the posts I have read from you, this one is the best. I gave you a frubal because I admired this post a lot. Very lovely couplet, in my opinion. Good post, Chinu.