Sorry to be blunt, but... it does not look like any version of Islaam justifies its own existence.
Well, you're entitled to your opinion. I think we're done here.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sorry to be blunt, but... it does not look like any version of Islaam justifies its own existence.
He is not a scholar and has no educational background in the matter. He is not a reputable source on the topic. Anyone can put up a website and make videos. He's just a crank.This expert and his videos are good places to start.
He is not a scholar and has no educational background in the matter. He is not a reputable source on the topic. Anyone can put up a website and make videos. He's just a crank.
He uses reasoned arguments, which is something that Islam cannot abide.
Islam has no problem with reasoned arguments.
If that were the case, it would have no problem with Bill Warner and his expertise.
Mr Warner sees his sources through his particular lens. His arguments aren't the only way to understand those sources. Two people can both use reasoned arguments with reference to the same sources and come to different conclusions.
If Islam is good and perfect, why does it need western governments to give it special protection against criticism?
Should there be a UN treaty against insulting religion?
That's just PC nonsense on the part of those governments.
Nope.