Why Homosexuality is Immoral

[Sunstone]

Because.

 

[Nanda]

Can't argue with that. Literally.

 

[oldcajun]

Because.

Depends on who's looking at it.To those that believe in traditional morality it's immoral. To the adherants of the "new morality" (old immorality) it's a constitutional right. Not unexpected.

 

[Sunstone]

Depends on who's looking at it.To those that believe in traditional morality it's immoral. To the adherants of the "new morality" (old immorality) it's a constitutional right. Not unexpected.

You forgot to be funny. Please try again.

 

[Gentoo]

Because.

Well, I've been swayed..

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

It's immoral to be attracted to people who I don't find attractive. This means that gay guys, hetero girls, and anyone attracted to women I wouldn't be into are evil, horrible people.

 

[Gaddock]

Depends on who's looking at it.To those that believe in traditional morality it's immoral. To the adherants of the "new morality" (old immorality) it's a constitutional right. Not unexpected.

I never really understand the point of posts like this. Basically you are saying some people think one think and some don't - which is true of pretty much every topic on here and which we all know anyway. If you want to make a point why don't you give a reasoned arguement -a point of view backed up by logic rather than just saying something we already know?

Or is it that you are trying to imply that any beleif anybody has about anything is equally valid and that we have no basis on which to discriminate between one proal position and another? If so then this is a different question altogether and deserves to be made explicit on its own thread.

Regards

Gaddock

 

[Sunstone]

I never really understand the point of posts like this. Basically you are saying some people think one think and some don't - which is true of pretty much every topic on here and which we all know anyway. If you want to make a point why don't you give a reasoned arguement -a point of view backed up by logic rather than just saying something we already know?

Or is it that you are trying to imply that any beleif anybody has about anything is equally valid and that we have no basis on which to discriminate between one proal position and another? If so then this is a different question altogether and deserves to be made explicit on its own thread.

Regards

Gaddock

Huh? Did you notice this is in the jokes section?

 

[Gaddock]

Huh? Did you notice this is in the jokes section?

But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny

Neither is this one. It must be immoral.

 

[Hema]

I just noticed the pole.

 

[Sunstone]

But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny

I cannot dispute the truth of that.

 

[whereismynotecard]

Because.

No body ever told me that... All of the other times people have tried to explain it to me it was too long and boring and I zoned out, but that explanation is short and simple. It all makes sense now.

 

[Magic Man]

Yeah, can I get one with extra cheese, one with pepperoni and pineapple, and one veggie lover's, please?

 

[Don Penguinoini]

But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny

Evil! He speaks against Sunstone!

 

[Panda]

I just noticed the pole.

Wrong type of poll. The type you said is the sort that is found in Mystics living room or all the rooms in sunstones house

 

[Sunstone]

No body ever told me that... All of the other times people have tried to explain it to me it was too long and boring and I zoned out, but that explanation is short and simple. It all makes sense now.

See? Folks might think I'm just a deranged old guy, but I'm actually a deranged old guy on a mission to provide folks with good, solid reasons for believing things.

 

[Charity]

I never really understand the point of posts like this. Basically you are saying some people think one think and some don't - which is true of pretty much every topic on here and which we all know anyway. If you want to make a point why don't you give a reasoned arguement -a point of view backed up by logic rather than just saying something we already know?

Or is it that you are trying to imply that any beleif anybody has about anything is equally valid and that we have no basis on which to discriminate between one proal position and another? If so then this is a different question altogether and deserves to be made explicit on its own thread.
Gaddock

:banghead3 :faint:

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

See? Folks might think I'm just a deranged old guy, but I'm actually a deranged old guy on a mission to provide folks with good, solid reasons for believing things.

Puts me in mind of a line I heard years ago:

"Every complex question has a simple, easy-to-understand wrong answer."