Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because.
Depends on who's looking at it.To those that believe in traditional morality it's immoral. To the adherants of the "new morality" (old immorality) it's a constitutional right. Not unexpected.
Because.
Depends on who's looking at it.To those that believe in traditional morality it's immoral. To the adherants of the "new morality" (old immorality) it's a constitutional right. Not unexpected.
I never really understand the point of posts like this. Basically you are saying some people think one think and some don't - which is true of pretty much every topic on here and which we all know anyway. If you want to make a point why don't you give a reasoned arguement -a point of view backed up by logic rather than just saying something we already know?
Or is it that you are trying to imply that any beleif anybody has about anything is equally valid and that we have no basis on which to discriminate between one proal position and another? If so then this is a different question altogether and deserves to be made explicit on its own thread.
Regards
Gaddock
Huh? Did you notice this is in the jokes section?
But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny
But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny
Because.
Evil! He speaks against Sunstone!But as you yourself pointed out, this post wasn't funny
I just noticed the pole.
No body ever told me that... All of the other times people have tried to explain it to me it was too long and boring and I zoned out, but that explanation is short and simple. It all makes sense now.
:banghead3 :faint:I never really understand the point of posts like this. Basically you are saying some people think one think and some don't - which is true of pretty much every topic on here and which we all know anyway. If you want to make a point why don't you give a reasoned arguement -a point of view backed up by logic rather than just saying something we already know?
Or is it that you are trying to imply that any beleif anybody has about anything is equally valid and that we have no basis on which to discriminate between one proal position and another? If so then this is a different question altogether and deserves to be made explicit on its own thread.
Gaddock
See? Folks might think I'm just a deranged old guy, but I'm actually a deranged old guy on a mission to provide folks with good, solid reasons for believing things.