The explanation by Ba'ahallah to "seal of the Prophets" doesn't make sense to me.
The following is from Kitabal Itqan.
Likewise, from this statement it is made evident that the term "last" is applicable to the "first," and the term "first" applicable to the "last;" inasmuch as both the "first" and the "last" have risen to proclaim one and the same Faith.
Notwithstanding the obviousness of this theme, in the eyes of those that have quaffed the wine of
knowledge and certitude, yet how many are those who, through failure to understand its meaning, have allowed the term "Seal of the Prophets" to obscure their understanding, and deprive them of the grace of all His manifold bounties! Hath not Muhhammad, Himself, declared: "I am all the Prophets?" Hath He not said as We have already mentioned: "I am Adam, Noah, Moses, and Jesus?" Why should Muhammad, that immortal Beauty, Who hath said: "I am the first Adam" be incapable of saying also: "I am the last Adam"? For even as He regarded Himself to be the "First of the Prophets" — that is Adam — in like manner, the "Seal of the Prophets" is also applicable unto that Divine Beauty. It is admittedly obvious that being the "First of the Prophets," He likewise is their "Seal."
The mystery of this theme hath, in this Dispensation, been a sore test unto all mankind. Behold, how many are those who, clinging unto these words, have disbelieved Him Who is their true Revealer. What, We ask, could this people presume the terms "first" and "last" — when referring to God — glorified be His Name! — to mean? If they maintain that these terms bear reference to
this material universe, how could it be possible, when the visible order of things is still manifestly existing? Nay, in this instance, by "first" is meant no other than the "last" and by "last" no other than the "first."
Some comments, God could've said in Quran something to that meaning, and Muslims would understand it metaphorically, for example, if Quran said, "it's as if Mohammad is all the Prophets" but not with stating Mohammad is the seal of Prophets to mean this.
It's too much. This means the impression is Mohammad is the last Prophet, but all it means, is the Prophets are all one another. This frankly, doesn't make sense, and you can deny any clear meaning of a verse in this respect.
Baha'allah acknowledges Du'a Nudba and this prayer contradicts the Bahai religon
"Among those writings are the following words recorded in the "Prayer of Nudbih"" That is from Baha'allah, he quotes it and quotes a lot from it in kitabal Itqan to prove his philosophy. While he went into great lengths to explain seal of Prophets, to mean all Prophets are each other, and not that Mohammad is really the seal, what he seemed to have forgotten to explain is a famous hadith.
"You have the position to me as Aaron does to Moses except that there is no Prophet after me"
This is a famous hadith in both Sunni and Shiite hadiths, but, say Baha'is wanted us to question it, they can't really, when it's in Du'a Nudba as well.
And in Du'a nudba there is other things said about the Mahdi to him, for example, if we can find a way to meet, I highly suggest people to read Du'a Nudba. It's on right here if anyone is interested: Dua nudba
The day of judgment
This was all said to be about Baha'allah, and frankly that's crazy to me.
No Ahlulbayt - 12 Imams or Imam alive now for Bahais.
The Bab didn't have an Ahlulbayt like the structure of guidance in Quran. Neither did Baha'allah. Instead you have this committee. Sorry, Ahlulbayt and chosen ones and the kings of God not supposed to replaced by some committee!
. 
