No. I did. To be fair, that is a gross generalization, but few secularists go to as much length to "cure" homosexuality. Some idiots don't know the meaning of the word "no", but stupidity is sprinkled across mankind quite liberally, regardless of creed, religion, philosophy, shoe size, etc.
Here's the thing: the definition of "masculinity" is entirely socially reletive. Am i losing masculine points if i take up knitting? Many would say i would be, it being women's work and all, right? To say that masculinity is going down is to say there is a scale with which to measure exactly how manly i may or may not be. It's a cultural standard, subject to change and mutation (kinda like evolution). The perfect alpha male, by a natural biologists definition, can exist but that's irrelevent here. I used that term here as the absolute (perceived) measure of masculine social behaviour. To demonstrate dominance, an alpha male eliminates threats to his position; this is my account on homophobia. Homosexuals often represent a social challenge to dogma by insisting that they be suffered. Any male wishing to distinguish himself need only reference "common sense" as to whether anyone in his sights deviates from acceptable, social norms and respond with the weight his sense of social justice requires. With the threat neutralized, the alpha male can return to the herd in glory knowing that he has actively protected all from the un-normal.
I'm not trying to be antagonistic, nor do i think you're being contrary or false. But i definately believe that you give too little value to the homophobics incentives.