Do you worship everything you find awesome?
Worship, etymologically anyway, means to have adoration or deep respect for something. So uh, the answer is yes, at least in that sense of the word.
I should qualify that, however, with the fact that it has to be truly awesome, awe-inspiring. Maybe it's more so that awesome things are the vessel rather than the object. For example a song, while isn't the focus of the sense of reverence, is the vessel through which it is experienced.
So it is and can be with a deity. When I listen to certain types of scales and timbres I focus on them intently as I would when in meditative worship. That auditory experience is the same as a depiction one might worship. Worshiping of physical idols ect is pretty common in Hinduism. I just tend to prefer sound over sight when it comes to most things.
Though this shouldn't be mistaken with just being really into music. Music can be divine in it's own right, but there is something uniquely special to me about contextualizing music into my magical (as in trying to cause changes or reactions), spiritual (as in sense of and nature of one's self) and religious beliefs (the organized, theological aspect). One can have religious music, or spiritual music, or even music meant to have some kind of magical effect. But for me it's the intersection of those 3 that create the kind of sense of divinity found in worship. The music is both the focal point of and the vessel of the worship. Likewise, the deity worshiped is both the vessel and focal point.
I hope that makes sense.
Ah, I see. So you worship god for self-realization? To better yourself? Become one with god? May I ask how worship helps you achieve these goals?
All three. It helps because, being in ignorance, we are unable to conceptualize true nature. The deity is a tool towards that end by personification. I am somewhat partial to Swami Krishnananda's explanation of Ishvaras (divine inspiration) in Yoga. Essentially the metaphor is that a deity is like a lion you see in a dream. The lion can scare you awake. It wasn't real, but none-the-less it had awakened you to the waking world. To me a deity is the intentional use of this metaphorical lion. I view how we perceive and are conscious of ourselves and of the world as much like a dream, although actual dreams are much less 'real' than our world, it's still derived and based off of them. Likewise our world is based on a more clear reality "above" it.
I have a hunch though that the difference is less spectacular from our world and this higher world than it is our world and the dream world, however. In Trika, we believe that the physical world is concrete and so we differ than this from many other kinds of Hindus.
In literal dreams we can respond to real life stimuli which affect the dream in illogical ways (there is some research on this but if you've ever woken up and realized a noise or breeze made you dream something you know what I mean). I think in our waking world we likewise react to the realest stimuli but that it's filtered through our limited perception and has a direct logical connection rather than the more non-sequitor that waking-world stimuli can cause in literal dreams. So the relation between these layered worlds might be more exponential rather than linear.