Because it so often requires blind faith, and blind faith appeals to those who prefer not to think for themselves (as in the vast majority of people).
Why do you think that monotheism is different than polytheism in this regard?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because it so often requires blind faith, and blind faith appeals to those who prefer not to think for themselves (as in the vast majority of people).
Dear gods, why didn't I remember this point earlier:
Early anthropology followed the idea that religion followed a sort of evolutionary progression from primitive (lesser) forms like animism to civilized (greater) forms. Although these ideas are now recognized for the ethnocentric and culturally biased crap they were, mainstream society still seems to hold to the idea.
Thanks for reminding me of this.
I suppose, but knowing too much about chemistry for my own good, I also recognize that there are very important distinctions between the three and it's not quite right to say they're equivalents. They're "the same" in the sense that they are all dihydrogen monoxide, but not at all "the same" with respect to other important physical properties. To me, this metaphor is similar to the "facets of a diamond" idea that is often spoke of by soft polytheists within Neopaganism, so the Christian trinity seems like soft polytheism to me (or soft monotheism, if we prefer... whatever). Judaism on the other hand is hard monotheism; God is God and there is no other God but God; no Father/Son/Holy Spirit thing going on.
Personally, I don't think the divine is a numbers game anyway. How you split up the pieces is a matter of your own point of view.
Namaste
Why do you feel monotheism is best? Why is the Abrahamic model of monotheism so revered and touted as the best form of worship?
Why?.In my opinion it is best because it makes logical sense. If God A is stronger then God B, then God B cannot really be God.
He made to claims: that he was the Messiah, and that he was a "Son of God". That's it.
So you think that God is one, and if people are polytheists, they are just worshipping all the aspects of one God in different forms?
If at all one wants to be a theist, then monotheism is the best. It eliminates worldly things as 'not god', which is a good thing. Cultures where monotheism is absent or very faint tend to worship even animals and people as gods.
Besides, how do you know that the cow is "not god"?
Really, I mean really? You mean god wrecked my car by stupidly running out onto the road? And I killed him? Her? I really am going to hell.I think you misunderstand animism and polytheism. (For example) They aren't worshiping cows as just a cow, but as a manifestation, or representation, of deity.
Besides, how do you know that the cow is "not god"?
Monotheism is 'best' because monotheistic civilizations have been more globally dominant.Namaste
Why do you feel monotheism is best? Why is the Abrahamic model of monotheism so revered and touted as the best form of worship?
it is a good thing only if the worldly things are 'not god', seems like monotheists has complete idea about god which makes them capable to differenciate between 'god' and 'not god'.If at all one wants to be a theist, then monotheism is the best. It eliminates worldly things as 'not god', which is a good thing.
you dont bow to buddha?Cultures where monotheism is absent or very faint tend to worship even animals and people as gods.
Why do you feel monotheism is best?
Why is the Abrahamic model of monotheism so revered and touted as the best form of worship?
Why do you think that monotheism is different than polytheism in this regard?
Okay, but what if there is no most powerful? What if the most powerful organism is equally as powerful as another existing organism? They then are the two most powerful organisms, but neither is more powerful than another.
What if the universe was created then who created it since both are labelled as creator of all thing for example if God A creates a Atom then God B didn't create that Atom therefore he is not the creator of all things.I understood that, but why can't there be two creators of all things, the two had always existed, as that one creator of all things would have always existed.
Indeed, it's quite frightening.