• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Is the Killer of British MP Jo Cox Not Being Called a “Terrorist”?

gnomon

Well-Known Member
Maybe it's just me but reading the OP and reading the last five pages of responses........this thread seems seriously sidetracked.

In the OP we have the question of whether not, as I took the implication and the nature of the media for the last.......oh.......fifteen years, that terrorism is often attached to Islam. Yet here we have a case of a political figure murdered by an individual belonging to a fringe political group.

So....I have to ask? Why bring up Orlando? Why bring up poems regarding the past?

Was the individual who murdered Jo Cox a terrorist or not?

That is the question of the OP.

So what is the necessity of anything else brought up?

What's the point? What's to prove?

edit: And to add...the merely two individuals who killed 168 people in Oklahoma and barely tied to any other organization were convicted and executed as terrorists.
 
Last edited:

Tomorrows_Child

Active Member
Because he is white but the same media which labels every and nay brown person, especially if they are muslims, as terrorists and puts an entire race or religion on trial is now backtracking, denying facts that he was an active member of Britain First and did not, at any point, even during his opening trial stand, shy away from it. Yet we can't take his word for it, because he is "mentally ill".

People on this forum, so quick to bigot an entire religious group are actually defending him and that makes me sick. Despicable people.
 

Tomorrows_Child

Active Member
Maybe it's just me but reading the OP and reading the last five pages of responses........this thread seems seriously sidetracked.

In the OP we have the question of whether not, as I took the implication and the nature of the media for the last.......oh.......fifteen years, that terrorism is often attached to Islam. Yet here we have a case of a political figure murdered by an individual belonging to a fringe political group.

So....I have to ask? Why bring up Orlando? Why bring up poems regarding the past?

Was the individual who murdered Jo Cox a terrorist or not?

That is the question of the OP.

So what is the necessity of anything else brought up?

What's the point? What's to prove?

edit: And to add...the merely two individuals who killed 168 people in Oklahoma and barely tied to any other organization were convicted and executed as terrorists.

Come on now, why are you bringing facts and logic into it?
 
Top