This is not going to go well, is it?
This thread however, demonstrates to me why we don't have a female president.
Beat me to it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is not going to go well, is it?
This thread however, demonstrates to me why we don't have a female president.
Her giant adam's apple might cow Putin & save Ukraine.
Obama wanted to airstrike Assads chemical warfare factories but chickened.
Israel wanted to nuke Irans nuclear reactors but again Obama chickened and wouldn't let them.
Now IS are rampaging in northern Iraq but he's cluck-clucking again and said on TV "We will not commit US troops to the area"
Yup, the White House definitely needs a tough dame in there..
I am not cool. I'm fully aware that mocking a person's appearance is bad form,
You said that to a trans woman. That's doubly not cool.
Of the tickets I've voted for, there have been several female VP candidates.This is not going to go well, is it?
This thread however, demonstrates to me why we don't have a female president.
Of the tickets I've voted for, there have been several female VP candidates.
They lost fair & square because of voters' political preferences, not gender.
I'm not counting third party tickets, because the awareness of them by the average voter is so low that neither men nor women get anywhere near the level of attention. Perhaps that means they have an easier time of making it to the ticket in the first place. Although VP candidates are rarely elected (I don't know how all the parties work, but obviously in the two primary parties, they're selected) and I think that says something, that that's where women make it to the ticket, in the VP slot.
The questions that are asked of a female candidate aren't the same ones asked of a male candidate, the expectations are similarly different. Clinton was subject to this and so was Palin. So have many, many others who didn't make it that far.
I agree with everything.I'm not counting third party tickets, because the awareness of them by the average voter is so low that neither men nor women get anywhere near the level of attention. Perhaps that means they have an easier time of making it to the ticket in the first place. Although VP candidates are rarely elected (I don't know how all the parties work, but obviously in the two primary parties, they're selected) and I think that says something, that that's where women make it to the ticket, in the VP slot.
The questions that are asked of a female candidate aren't the same ones asked of a male candidate, the expectations are similarly different. Clinton was subject to this and so was Palin. So have many, many others who didn't make it that far.
Palin seem to be treated much worse than any other candidate I can think of.Palin was pornified and ditzified, while Clinton has been *****ified and shriekified.
Either women candidates for the highest executive office are talked about for their looks or for the tone of their voices. Their stances typically are not considered nearly as much as the stances of male candidates by the pundits or the public.
I disagree. First of all, she's not a real doctor. At least Rand Paul couldDr. Condie Rice would be the most QUALIFIED candidate for President hands down
And ya know what? I don't care (I also never developed an adam's apple). I thought the comment was funny myself. Coulter is so hateful she deserves ridicule. Of course making fun of her "madam's apple" isn't very pc, but neither was her "******" comment about John Edwards. And, hey, she claims to be more of a man than any Liberal out there, so on that note, maybe that giant adam's apple will cow Putin. I'll even take it a step further; after her comment about 9/11 widows, saying Jews need to be "perfected," and calling those of Middle Eastern descent "********" and "jihad monkeys," she deserves to have the fact her face looks more masculine than feminine pointed out.
You said that to a trans woman. That's doubly not cool.
Palin probably did get it worse, especially considering things like the SNL skit that convinced America that Palin is convinced she can see Russia from her back yard (or however it went). But with Clinton, even as old as she is, I still hear alot of guys going on about "her time of the month" and how she'll "be itching to press the [nuclear bomb] button."Palin seem to be treated much worse than any other candidate I can think of.
Hillary...she seems to fare better than Dubya (even his name is an insult), so I don't
think her gender is much of a handicap. It even appears to be an advantage, eg,
the "chickenhawk" epithet doesn't stick.
If she becomes the Dem prez'l nominee, you & I will revisit this.
I've surveyed people IRL about her "I can see Russian from my house!" remark.Palin probably did get it worse, especially considering things like the SNL skit that convinced America that Palin is convinced she can see Russia from her back yard (or however it went). But with Clinton, even as old as she is, I still hear alot of guys going on about "her time of the month" and how she'll "be itching to press the [nuclear bomb] button."
Palin seem to be treated much worse than any other candidate I can think of.
Hillary...she seems to fare better than Dubya (even his name is an insult), so I don't
think her gender is much of a handicap. It even appears to be an advantage, eg,
the "chickenhawk" epithet doesn't stick.
If she becomes the Dem prez'l nominee, you & I will revisit this.