Rakovsky
Active Member
As far as I can tell, in Maimonides' reading, Isaiah is saying: Messiah won't die via "ratsats" before putting justice in the earth and distant places await hearing his teaching. Now why mention dying at all in the verse? The verse seems to be saying that chronologically, Messiah will come, he sets justice in the earth, islands await his teaching, before he dies.
Now, why does it say the islands "await" his teaching before he dies, and not "the islands hear his teaching" before he dies? Certainly, spreading his teaching to the ends of the earth is a goal of Messiah, and if the islands await, then in justice their expectation should be fulfilled. It seems that therefore at some point the islands do hear Messiah's teaching, but it's not mentioned that they do in this verse about Messiah's life before dying because Messiah would die while they are still awaiting his teaching.
In the passage, Maimonides appears to be talking about Messiah ben David dying, as he writes:
Further, Maimonides does not seem to make Messiah's death a conditional. He nowhere mentions the "two Messiahs" theory, and he says "the Messiah will die" and "God has clearly declared his death", not "the Messiah could die", or "a Messiah will die".
M. Morgan writes about this in Rethinking the Messianic Idea in Judaism: "By way of emphasizing messianic naturalism, and by way of countering Christian messianism, Maimonides stresses here that the Messiah will die and will be succeeded by his son and further descendants."
That being the case, my first question here would be:
What does it mean that the Messiah's death would be by yaruts / ratsats?
If Messiah's death is crushing, breaking, oppressing, bruising, etc., does that imply it is different than a peaceful, painless death?
Besides the translations we've already discussed, I can note that of the Russian Lubavitcher Chassidus website. It is like a Russian counterpart to the English "Chabad" website. Its Tanakh translation of Isaiah 42:4 says:
And this raises a second question: Why do Isaiah or Maimonides believe that Messiah would undergo death by ratsats?
My third question is:
Has Maimonides given further Messianic explanations about Isaiah 42:1-4?
It could help us better understand his thinking.
I found Targum Jonathan on 42:1 interpreting this as about Messiah like Maimonides says:
Verse 1: Behold My servant, whom I uphold; Mine elect, in whom My soul delighteth;
Targum: Behold, my servant, the Messiah, whom I bring, my chosen in whom one delights:
Here is a different translation of the Targum:
See my servant the Messiah whom I bring near,
my chosen one in whom my Word [Memra] takes delight;
I will place my Holy Spirit upon him
and he will reveal my Torah to the nations.
(SOURCE: Messianic Exegesis)
My fourth question is:
Are there other Jewish traditions saying that Messiah ben David would die?
I understand that this can simply be a normal conclusion from the belief that Messiah is a normal mortal human, but I still wanted to see if there was more writing on this like Maimonides gave.
Rabbi Nachman wrote:
Uri Yosef writes on the Messiah Truth forum:
I don't think that passing on inheritance implies the cause of death, however.
Ervin Patai, who received his doctorate from Hebrew University, where he also taught, wrote about Messiah's death:
In Pesach: A Kid, a Kid. And All of Jewish History, one writer claims that the scholar lijah ben Solomon Zalman, or "Vilna Goan", had a teaching where an "ox gets slaughtered by a butcher. The butcher is killed by the Angel of Death, And finally the Angel of Death is ended by God." He writes that Vilna Goan's theory includes Messiah's death
Aaron Minsky writes in his book Beyond Faith: Exploring Judaism and comparing it to other religions:
Now, why does it say the islands "await" his teaching before he dies, and not "the islands hear his teaching" before he dies? Certainly, spreading his teaching to the ends of the earth is a goal of Messiah, and if the islands await, then in justice their expectation should be fulfilled. It seems that therefore at some point the islands do hear Messiah's teaching, but it's not mentioned that they do in this verse about Messiah's life before dying because Messiah would die while they are still awaiting his teaching.
In the passage, Maimonides appears to be talking about Messiah ben David dying, as he writes:
But the Messiah will die, and his son and son's son will reign in his stead. God has clearly declared his death in the words, לא יכהה ולא ירוץ עד ישים בארץ משפט (Isaiah 42:4). His kingdom will endure a very long time... From the general nature of this principle of faith we gather that there will be no king of Israel but from David and the descendants of Solomon exclusively. Every one who disputes the authority of this family denies God and the words of his prophets.
Further, Maimonides does not seem to make Messiah's death a conditional. He nowhere mentions the "two Messiahs" theory, and he says "the Messiah will die" and "God has clearly declared his death", not "the Messiah could die", or "a Messiah will die".
M. Morgan writes about this in Rethinking the Messianic Idea in Judaism: "By way of emphasizing messianic naturalism, and by way of countering Christian messianism, Maimonides stresses here that the Messiah will die and will be succeeded by his son and further descendants."
That being the case, my first question here would be:
What does it mean that the Messiah's death would be by yaruts / ratsats?
If Messiah's death is crushing, breaking, oppressing, bruising, etc., does that imply it is different than a peaceful, painless death?
Besides the translations we've already discussed, I can note that of the Russian Lubavitcher Chassidus website. It is like a Russian counterpart to the English "Chabad" website. Its Tanakh translation of Isaiah 42:4 says:
Танах с параллельным текстом на русском и ивритеНе ослабеет он и не сломится, пока не установит на земле правосудие, и учения его острова ждать будут.
He won't weaken and won't be broken, so long as he doesn't establish justice on earth, and the islands await his teachings.
And this raises a second question: Why do Isaiah or Maimonides believe that Messiah would undergo death by ratsats?
My third question is:
Has Maimonides given further Messianic explanations about Isaiah 42:1-4?
It could help us better understand his thinking.
I found Targum Jonathan on 42:1 interpreting this as about Messiah like Maimonides says:
Verse 1: Behold My servant, whom I uphold; Mine elect, in whom My soul delighteth;
Targum: Behold, my servant, the Messiah, whom I bring, my chosen in whom one delights:
Here is a different translation of the Targum:
See my servant the Messiah whom I bring near,
my chosen one in whom my Word [Memra] takes delight;
I will place my Holy Spirit upon him
and he will reveal my Torah to the nations.
(SOURCE: Messianic Exegesis)
My fourth question is:
Are there other Jewish traditions saying that Messiah ben David would die?
I understand that this can simply be a normal conclusion from the belief that Messiah is a normal mortal human, but I still wanted to see if there was more writing on this like Maimonides gave.
Rabbi Nachman wrote:
People think that there will be no more death after the messiah comes. This is not so. Even the messiah will die. (Chayei Moharan II, p. 13, #35).
Uri Yosef writes on the Messiah Truth forum:
The underlined phrase is an interesting, astute observation by Uri Yosef. I agree that passing on an inheritance implies he died.In the Hebrew Bible, there are passages that tell us the Messiah will leave an inheritance to his sons [e.g., Ezekiel 46:16-17]. The implication is that he will pass on, but of old age and after he completed executing the messianic agenda that is laid out in the Hebrew Bible.
...
=========================================
25. And they shall dwell on the land that I have given to My servant, to Jacob, wherein your forefathers lived; and they shall dwell upon it, they and their children and their children's children, forever; and My servant David shall be their prince forever.
...
16. So says the Lord God: If the prince give a gift to any of his sons, it is his inheritance and remains in his sons' possession; it is their property by inheritance
========================================
I personally prefer to accept the opinion of Metzudat David [Rabbi David ben Zimra (1462-1572)] and Avot d'Rabbi Nathan [the earliest commentary on Pirkei Avot, by (the school of) the Tanna Rabbi Nathan], who say this is a reference to the eternity of the Davidic throne (sort of a repetition of 2 Samuel 7:16), and not a literal reference to an eternally living Messiah named David.
does the Old Testament say that the Messiah will die? in Ask The Rabbi Forum
I don't think that passing on inheritance implies the cause of death, however.
Ervin Patai, who received his doctorate from Hebrew University, where he also taught, wrote about Messiah's death:
I think the underlined parts are suggesting that Messiah ben Joseph who dies and Messiah ben David who resurrects him are the same person.When the death of the Messiah became an established tenet in Talmudic times, this was felt to be irreconcilable with the belief in the Messiah as Redeemer who would usher in the blissful millennium of the Messianic Age. The dilemma was solved by splitting the person of the Messiah in two: one of them, called Messiah ben Joseph, was to raise the armies of Israel against their enemies, and, after many victories and miracles, would fall victim Gog and Magog. The other, Messiah ben David, will come after him (in some legends will bring him back to life, which psychologically hints at the identity of the two), and will lead Israel to the ultimate victory, the triumph, and the Messianic era of bliss.
Patai, Raphael, The Messiah Texts, Avon Books, 1979
In Pesach: A Kid, a Kid. And All of Jewish History, one writer claims that the scholar lijah ben Solomon Zalman, or "Vilna Goan", had a teaching where an "ox gets slaughtered by a butcher. The butcher is killed by the Angel of Death, And finally the Angel of Death is ended by God." He writes that Vilna Goan's theory includes Messiah's death
Pesach: A Kid, a Kid. And All of Jewish History. – By Benthe Butcher. The Mashiach. ... the word is actually schecter. He’s not some dime a dozen animal slaughterer. A schecter knows and is proficient in the mitzvahs of killing an animal in a painless and holy way, making it kosher. The metaphor is appropriate as Jewish understanding of the messiah is a military leader. ...
But even the Mashiach will die at the hands of the Angel of Death. And the Jews will once again be plunged into a period of darkness. But finally in the end, Hadosh Baruchu, our God will end the Angel of Death and with it all of death.
Aaron Minsky writes in his book Beyond Faith: Exploring Judaism and comparing it to other religions:
There are many references to moshiach in the Prophets and the Writings in the Bible. I will cite just one, which is very well known.... ".... unto him shall the nations seek; and his resting place shall be glorious." (Isaiah 11:1-10) The final verse seems to indicate that the moshiach will die, but this conforms to the Jewish concept that he will be human and die like everyone else.