Trailblazer
Veteran Member
He is a nonreligious believer so he does not believe in the Bible.No verse references?
Read the first 3 chapters of Romans. It'll answer you question.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He is a nonreligious believer so he does not believe in the Bible.No verse references?
Read the first 3 chapters of Romans. It'll answer you question.
You completely forgot to answer my question:Well, you could ignore context, but you'll not get the true picture. That is true of any body of writing, whether profane or religious.
Have you never understood that the same word or idea can have a completely different meaning depending on the context?
He spoke like he did. I wonder why the Bible is one of the only books that people know all about without ever having actually read it for themselves.He is a nonreligious believer so he does not believe in the Bible.
Is a day really the same as a thousand years? No. You know that, I know that, and God certainly knows that.You completely forgot to answer my question:
One wonders if by the same logic every thing Paul says to that one specific church in that one specific town at that one specific time only applies to that one specific church in that one specific town at that one specific time as well?
Care to try it again?
He made up his own religion. It is called Discovering the Truth. He believes we can all Discover the Truth about God without any Messengers of God such as Jesus.He spoke like he did. I wonder why the Bible is one of the only books that people know all about without ever having actually read it for themselves.
Take care.
Good question. I'm not aware of any scriptures that would answer the question, so it's anybody's guess.
You can't have perfection without imperfection. That's part of free will. If we could only be perfect there would be no choice at being imperfect, hence no free will, and no free will means no love.Better yet--why did he create people with the full knowledge that they had flawed characters and would need a redeemer in the first place? Why not just create perfect beings with free will? After all, he loves good and hates sin right?
You can't have perfection without imperfection. That's part of free will. If we could only be perfect there would be no choice at being imperfect, hence no free will, and no free will means no love.
Just keep the bird in the cage. Don't take a chance he'll return if you set him free.
Yes, both God and Jesus have free will. Jesus contrasted his will with that of God's in the Garden of Gethsemane when he asked God if there wasn't some other way to redeem man besides the cross. He ended up saying, "not my will, but thine be done."Does God/Jesus have free will? If so, then how do you square that with your idea that free will requires imperfection?
Why did he wait four billion years before creating moral agents that might need a redeemer?
Better yet--why did he create people with the full knowledge that they had flawed characters and would need a redeemer in the first place? Why not just create perfect beings with free will? After all, he loves good and hates sin right?
Good point. The world was already populated with sinless animals behaving properly, according to their natures. Then, suddenly, a moral disaster appears.
I believe that is evolutionary drivel.
Why did God wait for 4,000 years before sending the redeemer? Verse references would be helpful.
I'm sure you do.I believe that is evolutionary drivel.
No, that's what the creationists believe.They must have just magically appeared.
LOL. Evolution is a demonstrable fact. You may not want to believe in facts, but facts don't change based on your personal feelings about them.
I'm sure you do.
I have concrete, empirical evidence for an old Earth. What evidence do you have to counter it?
And how does evolution fit in?