Fluffy
A fool
Okay, so if that's the case, if reason is shunned in matters of religion, why do you (if you're religious) choose your particular religion over any other?
I do not feel that reason is shunned. I have thrown away many of my beliefs simply because I felt that I could not logically support them.
Are you convinced your religion is more reasonable than another? And if you use reason to distinguish between two religions (in other words, to determine which is "more believable") are you in fact contradicting the idea of faith by using reason at all?
I consider what I think to be the most reasonable system of beliefs that I have come across. Why else would I hold to them?
I don't really view reason as flawed by I do view my reason as potentially flawed. Perhaps this is what people mean when they say that reason is a flawed tool. I would also describe it unnecessary in so far as some of my beliefs don't exist in my head because I have reasoned them out but simply because I want to believe in them. I make no claim that they might be true and I am in fact one of the first people to point out that they might be false. Somebody could convince me using reason that my beliefs were flawed simply because I couldn't actually believe in something that seemed unreasonable.
I don't really see why you view the supernatural as unreasonable. By the supernatural, are you referring to that which we cannot perceive through the senses? If you are then what is the relationship between what is "reasonable" and what is "true", in your belief system and do you feel that the natural is more reasonable and more true than the supernatural? Why or why not?