Katzpur
Not your average Mormon
Uh... I'm going to go with "NO!"Virginity here is a mental state, rather than a physical state. possible????????
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Uh... I'm going to go with "NO!"Virginity here is a mental state, rather than a physical state. possible????????
I was being sarcasticThat sounds about right. As we all know, sex is inherently dirty. :sarcastic
I could go into how Jesus couldn't possibly have been born on the winter solstice and still have the other myths of his birth be true, but that's a different topic. The point is that Christianity changed their theology while converting Rome to win over the army more easily, and you couldn't win over Rome without the army.But is there evidence that the emphasis on Mary's so-called "virginity" coincided with the adoption of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire?
Hmm, I never knew that one. Nice to know [/quote]I know that there's evidence that the crucifix became a prominent symbol during the Crusades, because Rome needed people who would be willing to kill and die for their religion, so they started to emphasize the "sacrifice" of Jesus as a symbol of love. Before that, the theology focused on the miracle of the resurrection, which is much more life affirming.
I'm not disputing that Christianity changed in order to more easily convert the Romans. I was curious as to whether there is evidence about that particular bit - the virgin birth - being changed for that reason.I could go into how Jesus couldn't possibly have been born on the winter solstice and still have the other myths of his birth be true, but that's a different topic. The point is that Christianity changed their theology while converting Rome to win over the army more easily, and you couldn't win over Rome without the army.
Theoretically speaking, why was a virgin birth necessary for the supposed Jesus?
He could have been a natural child of Joseph and Mary and still done the same things as outlined in the gospels, there is simply no reason a virgin birth was necessary.
Explain to me how a virgin got pregnant then, becuase it seems pretty impossible to me. Especially as back in those days they had no needles, IVF ETC
Nobody else's blood would have been good enough to cover all of mankinds sins. yes, he was born of a virgin and hence only has 24 chromosomes. Mother ,but no father.
Are you suggesting that God had sex with Mary while she was betrothed but before she was married to Joseph?God himself provided the other 24 chromosomes.
Are you suggesting that God had sex with Mary while she was betrothed but before she was married to Joseph?
No - the things outlined in the gospels could not have been done had he been a natural child of Joseph and mary. God was his literal father and it was because of this fact that he could suffer the sins of the world. Such an experience would have destroyed a natural child.
Well, the way I see it, if Jesus had been the natural child of Mary and Joseph, He would have been the son of Joseph, not the son of God. He may have been able to do miracles, but they wouldn't really have been His miracles because He wouldn't have been divine. As God's own Son, He was divine. He could do what He did through His own power. And as to why Mary was a virgin, I suppose I'd have to say that when she conceived, she was betrothed to Joseph. She would not have been worthy to marry Joseph had she not been a virgin.
He still impregnated somebody else's wife.Can humans today create life without sex? Yes.
Don't you think God could do the same?
Theoretically speaking, why was a virgin birth necessary for the supposed Jesus?
He could have been a natural child of Joseph and Mary and still done the same things as outlined in the gospels, there is simply no reason a virgin birth was necessary.
God himself provided the other 24 chromosomes.
I think just 1, a "Y" chromosome so he would be male.
23 from Mary, Females can't contribute the "Y" chromosome.
If he has 46 Chromosomes then my Salvation is ALL a LIE....that would mean he has a human father.
He still impregnated somebody else's wife.
And since we're all his children, he impregnated his own daughter on top of that.
That's nice. I disagree. I believe He was the Son of God.Jesus was a natural child of Mary and Joseph, not the Joseph who was the son of Jacob from the tribe of Judah who never knew Mary sexually until she had given birth to the first of her sons, but her half brother Joseph the son of Heli the father of Mary, see Luke 3: 23.
Just a quick question... How many chromosomes do you suspect Jesus had? If Jesus had 46 chromosomes, His father would have been the same species as He was. Not "human" because humans are mortal, but humanlike. Immortal, perfect.If he has 46 Chromosomes then my Salvation is ALL a LIE....that would mean he has a human father.