dust1n
Zindīq
While Creationism is usually little more than a stubborn refusal to acknowledge the findings of science, John Martin has a point; the word can be used, and arguably should, in a far more reasonable manner that in no way needs to deny scientific fact.
I agree, but generally, it's not my choice as to who uses what title before denying scientific fact. I'd be more than happy if Creationism referred to something less significantly dishonest.