I have heard talk of another Muslim Prophet recently, it had to do with the end times.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me please?
Can anyone shed some light on this for me please?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have heard talk of another Muslim Prophet recently, it had to do with the end times.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me please?
You mean Muhammad really was a prophet? Wow. You learn something new everyday.I have heard talk of another Muslim Prophet recently, it had to do with the end times.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me please?
Not the Mahdi - there are some that claim that's "weak" Hadith meaning lack of good historical evidence.Isn't it a well-accepted part of standard Muslim doctrine (both Shia and Sunni) that they are waiting for the eventual return of Jesus and the coming of the Mahdi?
You are welcome to but it would never occur to me to take it on faith.Seeing how there is hardly any way of demonstrating that he wasn't, it seems that it will have to be taken on faith.
That is an important distinction, Luis. Imho, non-Muslims should always refer to Muhammad as simply, Muhammad, as to promote the idea that he was a prophet is to commit theological suicide for the disbeliever.Nevertheless, there is no dispute that he is at the very least acknowledged as a Prophet by the Muslims, so the question remains unchanged.
Seeing how there is hardly any way of demonstrating that he wasn't, .
Indeed yes. We all have faith, and I use that word deliberately, that what we think or believe is true. And this is the case whether someone be a Muslim, Jew, Hindu or atheist.Seeing how there is hardly any way of demonstrating that he wasn't, it seems that it will have to be taken on faith.
Nevertheless, there is no dispute that he is at the very least acknowledged as a Prophet by the Muslims, so the question remains unchanged.
that what we think or believe is true. And this is the case whether someone be a Muslim, Jew, Hindu or atheist.
Love ya brother Luis, but your factually in error.
Showing how he factually plagiarized mythology and claimed it as real, not knowing history would later reveal his mistakes, makes this open and shut case for another warrior pedophile with blood on his hands trying to control others with his beliefs as a political tool.
Yes I am a bit overboard with this description, but it pretty much sums the truth up.
I have recently learned about their sectarianism and how many lives it has cost the USA in men, so Im a bit unhappy about the required Fanaticism, that requires us to go in and baby sit barbarian members of this religion saving other sects from savages.
It works to a little extent on the other direction as well. Education doesn't always substitute for mythology. Not on the motivational roles, at least.
I don't disagree, although I wonder how deep the changes have to be for literalism to be overcome.
I'm not disputing any of that, but how does that make him factually not a prophet?
Education is critical. And I uphold the value of science in telling us how the world works. Any time someone wants to disregard science in favor of some religious dogma, I'm on the side of science.Yes but don't you agree education and knowledge holds more credibility then known mythology?
Faith is one thing, and it is factually no substitute for education.