PureX
Veteran Member
What do you care?What will your response be if they convict?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you care?What will your response be if they convict?
What do you care?
Ditto.It wasn't a hard question
Answer my question. I didn't ask about Hilary.That might had been the case against Hillary Clinton if she were the authoritarian who had been elected.
During the 2016 election, Donald Trump suggested 'Second Amendment people' can stop Hillary Clinton.
I'd like to see any anti-Second amendment authoritarian taken down by pro-second amendment people.
Will our politicians Republican and democrat be able to accept the outcome or will they blather on and on about how wrong or unfair it was?
To not be able to would seem to show a distrust of our system and it's institutions which would seem to undermine our democracy and cause divisiveness.
don't care anymore ... I've kinda given up on American values and institutions.
Answer my question. I didn't ask about Hilary.
So you're saying that you support the country being ruled by an autocracy and that they can be abusive and oppressive tyrants as long as they don't ban guns? And that The Constitution somehow allows this?Even if President Donald J. Trump himself were to cross the line of trying to take away the people's right to be well-armed, then under that very hypothetical circumstance would I like to see this anti-Constitutional P.O.T.U.S. deposed from power.
So you're saying that you support the country being ruled by an autocracy and that they can be abusive and oppressive tyrants as long as they don't ban guns? And that The Constitution somehow allows this?
Suppose, while at least paying lip service to the Constitutional rights you care about, Trump is abusing his powers and obstructing efforts to prevent him from selling out US national interests to hostile foreign powers?Nope, never said that!
How has a powerful leader like Trump exercising his executive privilege abused or oppressed your Constitutional rights?
Suppose, while at least paying lip service to the Constitutional rights you care about, Trump is abusing his powers and obstructing efforts to prevent him from selling out US national interests to hostile foreign powers?
Does that distinct possibility matter to you? Do you think your guns will protect you from the fallout of Trump smoothing the way for Russia to regain it's position of "superpower very able to challenge the USA for global dominance"?
Tom
Ditto.
Loyalty before honour, huh? A recipe for a sad, sad world.I'd like to see any Republican Senator taken down for his/her non-loyalist betrayal of our P.O.T.U.S.
And so many Republicans took offense to Adam Schiff's "head on a pike" claim. It looks like he was right on.Loyalty before honour, huh? A recipe for a sad, sad world.
For starters, we already know the outcome, which is what makes it a sham trial and its outcome dishonest. And, no, I will not condone that kind of banana republic behavior from the Republicans, but I also don't care. I've come to accept that that is what America is today, and that it will become worse as the years unfurl. We're not really watching any more.
That ship has long since sailed.
Distrusting America is not what undermined American democracy, which is just a word now. What democracy? Sham elections, invited and welcomed foreign interference, a mindless electorate led by nose by incessant conservative media indoctrination, destroying uncounted ballots. and the purging of voter rolls (happened to me twice - went to vote, not on the roster - so I quit voting or caring long ago),
You have no say over what the federal government does. It doesn't ask you or listen to you. It's a dog and pony show meant to resemble a democracy to keep you thinking your opinion matters and that you are a participant in a democracy so that you will be content with what follows.
You don't appear to understand why it is a sham trial. It is a sham not because Democrats rushed to judgement. It is a sham because it appears that the Republicans know that Trump is guilty and don't want that to he made any more obvious.It's good to hear you say that this is a sham trial, some democrats wanted to impeach Trump before he even took oath, it was an impeachment looking for a reason no matter how flimsy or contrived the evidence.
Not enough evidence seems to be the outcome in all the claims they have thrown around over the past three years.
I doubt you have any more say over what the Mexican government, military, or police do. Corruption is rife with some actively involved in drug trafficking, torture, and murder within your very own borders. If you feel you have found a slice of your own heaven then that is good, I just hope that after eleven years you would be able to set down that sack of bricks you seem to carry around.
.
That the Republicans can force a not-guilty verdict is obvious or so we hear in the UK.Will our politicians Republican and democrat be able to accept the outcome or will they blather on and on about how wrong or unfair it was?
To not be able to would seem to show a distrust of our system and it's institutions which would seem to undermine our democracy and cause divisiveness.
That the Republicans can force a not-guilty verdict is obvious or so we hear in the UK.
So we don't expect to hear of any objective verdict.
I don't think it's a "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict in reality.That the Republicans can force a not-guilty verdict is obvious or so we hear in the UK.
So we don't expect to hear of any objective verdict.
Some democrats were calling for impeachment before Trump even took the oath of office, as I have said it was an impeachment waiting for an excuse so it seems there was no objectivity to begin with. If the evidence is so compelling republicans will.have no choice but to find him guilty. What you are saying is exactly what the democrats are pushing for, if the republicans don't agree with them then they can claim it was unfair when the reality may be that they just don't have convincing enough of an argument or enough evidence.
The democratic party is so splintered right now they don't seem to know which direction they want to go so they have a serious problem,Trump is their problem and they wish to get rid of him anyway they can if they hope to stand a chance in 2020. Lacking the ability to remove him they will just resort to the same old thing they have doing for quite a while, throw mud and pretend to take the high moral road (the moral party) and attempt to present themselves as the only real defenders of the Constitution.