Women: What happens in the voting booth, stays in the voting booth

[Subduction Zone]

Oh, I married someone who was abusive but I divorced him.

Sorry to hear that, and good for you. It is easy to make that sort of mistake.

 

[Kathryn]

Sorry to hear that, and good for you. It is easy to make that sort of mistake.

Thank you.

 

[wellwisher]

This is the kind of sexism in action that leads some men to think they should be controlling their wives 'for their own good.' Because they 'know better' than their "sweet," "hysterical," "blank-minded" and "ding bat" wives and literally these men think they're protecting her from her own "naive nature."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/benevolent-sexism

As an example of this need, the abortion issue is big with Leftist women, who try to bully their mates to go alone. These women think they know better. If one of these women had a husband who disagreed, what would she do? Why is it OK if woman lobby and nag their mate, and if that does not work they lie and sneak behind his back? Females assume a dual standard.

If you look at abortion there were about 1 million abortions in 2023. There are 326 million people in the USA. Even if we assume 1 abortion per woman in 2023, this amounts to 0.33% of the population, caring for their own needs, ahead of the issues important to the other 99.67%. If the husband sees the economy as more important, since a good economy will help 300 million people, why shouldn't the husband try to get his wife to be less selfish and learn some altruism? Put the hungry working poor before bimbo needs. Bimbo can also be OK, but make it third, behind prosperity, safety and security for all.

"She knows what to do", is another way of saying, she knows how to be selfish and has no concern for the hardship of anyone but herself. She may need some extra outside assistance, by her husband, based on her selfish pathology.

I can see if she was more concerned with other things, like back in the day; male=military and female=welfare, then both care. But when the most important issue is based on selfishness; 0.33%, and even militant deception, this is not a good path for the country. Harris is using the same approach of deception for power, without regard to the pain she has already given the majority of the working class. It is time for men to lead the bimbos, rather than the other way around. Men have cut women a lot of slack, since early women's liberal, but this new generation of women have gone off the rail; narrow selfishness. Time to reel them in. It also time to vote out the queen bee.

What has happened is, men tried to empathized and have spoiled the women into thinking they are more than they are; equals or more. Illusion like affirmative action and now DEI, can create a false sense of entitlement=equality. That is artificial. Trans sexual in women's sports, shows what can happen when men compete, full out, with women. Some women may need tough love, to snap them out of their fantasy ego-centric selfishness. Men can help to teach them, balance, so we can avoid going full backwards. We cannot go forward this way since it is borderline insane.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

It is time for men to lead the bimbos, rather than the other way around. Men have cut women a lot of slack, since early women's liberal, but this new generation of women have gone off the rail; narrow selfishness. Time to reel them in. It also time to vote out the queen bee.

More verification that ads like the one in question are relevant.

 

[Subduction Zone]

More verification that ads like the one in question are relevant.

I am not so sure. I recently heard how Trump was going to protect women, "Whether they like it or not". I am sure that they will find that to be very reassuring. After all, what woman would not want to be protected by an adjudicated sexual molester of woman. He has experience. He knows what to look for.

 

[Kathryn]

As an example of this need, the abortion issue is big with Leftist women, who try to bully their mates to go alone. These women think they know better. If one of these women had a husband who disagreed, what would she do? Why is it OK if woman lobby and nag their mate, and if that does not work they lie and sneak behind his back? Females assume a dual standard.

If you look at abortion there were about 1 million abortions in 2023. There are 326 million people in the USA. Even if we assume 1 abortion per woman in 2023, this amounts to 0.33% of the population, caring for their own needs, ahead of the issues important to the other 99.67%. If the husband sees the economy as more important, since a good economy will help 300 million people, why shouldn't the husband try to get his wife to be less selfish and learn some altruism? Put the hungry working poor before bimbo needs. Bimbo can also be OK, but make it third, behind prosperity, safety and security for all.

"She knows what to do", is another way of saying, she knows how to be selfish and has no concern for the hardship of anyone but herself. She may need some extra outside assistance, by her husband, based on her selfish pathology.

I can see if she was more concerned with other things, like back in the day; male=military and female=welfare, then both care. But when the most important issue is based on selfishness; 0.33%, and even militant deception, this is not a good path for the country. Harris is using the same approach of deception for power, without regard to the pain she has already given the majority of the working class. It is time for men to lead the bimbos, rather than the other way around. Men have cut women a lot of slack, since early women's liberal, but this new generation of women have gone off the rail; narrow selfishness. Time to reel them in. It also time to vote out the queen bee.

What has happened is, men tried to empathized and have spoiled the women into thinking they are more than they are; equals or more. Illusion like affirmative action and now DEI, can create a false sense of entitlement=equality. That is artificial. Trans sexual in women's sports, shows what can happen when men compete, full out, with women. Some women may need tough love, to snap them out of their fantasy ego-centric selfishness. Men can help to teach them, balance, so we can avoid going full backwards. We cannot go forward this way since it is borderline insane.

Over 40 percent of women who have had abortions have had more than one, for the record.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

What has happened is, men tried to empathized and have spoiled the women into thinking they are more than they are; equals or more.

I felt this needed emphasis.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

I am not so sure. I recently heard how Trump was going to protect women, "Whether they like it or not". I am sure that they will find that to be very reassuring. After all, what woman would not want to be protected by an adjudicated sexual molester of woman. He has experience. He knows what to look for.

Trump voters are calling Harris a "ditz" and saying women are bimbos and too emotional. Meanwhile, they are voting for...Trump.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Over 40 percent of women who have had abortions have had more than one, for the record.

Yes, that is true. This is actually an argument for Planned Parenthood. Do you know why?

 

[Kathryn]

Yes, that is true. This is actually an argument for Planned Parenthood. Do you know why?

I can guess. But you can also tell me to make sure.

Personally I'd find some other kind of birth control.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Trump voters are calling Harris a "ditz" and saying women are bimbos and too emotional. Meanwhile, they are voting for...Trump.

I know. And I am hoping that we can laugh in relief on Tuesday night. I think that one thing that might kill MAGA is laughter.

 

[crossfire]

As an example of this need, the abortion issue is big with Leftist women, who try to bully their mates to go alone. These women think they know better. If one of these women had a husband who disagreed, what would she do? Why is it OK if woman lobby and nag their mate, and if that does not work they lie and sneak behind his back? Females assume a dual standard.

If you look at abortion there were about 1 million abortions in 2023. There are 326 million people in the USA. Even if we assume 1 abortion per woman in 2023, this amounts to 0.33% of the population, caring for their own needs, ahead of the issues important to the other 99.67%. If the husband sees the economy as more important, since a good economy will help 300 million people, why shouldn't the husband try to get his wife to be less selfish and learn some altruism? Put the hungry working poor before bimbo needs. Bimbo can also be OK, but make it third, behind prosperity, safety and security for all.

"She knows what to do", is another way of saying, she knows how to be selfish and has no concern for the hardship of anyone but herself. She may need some extra outside assistance, by her husband, based on her selfish pathology.

I can see if she was more concerned with other things, like back in the day; male=military and female=welfare, then both care. But when the most important issue is based on selfishness; 0.33%, and even militant deception, this is not a good path for the country. Harris is using the same approach of deception for power, without regard to the pain she has already given the majority of the working class. It is time for men to lead the bimbos, rather than the other way around. Men have cut women a lot of slack, since early women's liberal, but this new generation of women have gone off the rail; narrow selfishness. Time to reel them in. It also time to vote out the queen bee.

What has happened is, men tried to empathized and have spoiled the women into thinking they are more than they are; equals or more. Illusion like affirmative action and now DEI, can create a false sense of entitlement=equality. That is artificial. Trans sexual in women's sports, shows what can happen when men compete, full out, with women. Some women may need tough love, to snap them out of their fantasy ego-centric selfishness. Men can help to teach them, balance, so we can avoid going full backwards. We cannot go forward this way since it is borderline insane.

Perhaps this explains the high divorce rate!

 

[Subduction Zone]

I can guess. But you can also tell me to make sure.

You can tell Planned Parenthood's goal by its title. The first word is "Planned". Their number one job is not providing abortions. It is providing education and low cost to free birth control so that those who do not plan on getting pregnant can avoid pregnancy. It can be shown that neighborhoods with a Planned Parenthood office have lower abortion rates that areas without a Planned Parenthood. Instead of infringing on the rights of others it is much wiser to try to educate young women and provide them with the support that they need.

 

[F1fan]

What's amusing is the lefts view on women's rights to choose when it comes to voting but if a women chooses to vote Trump, she will be attacked, ridiculed, told how bad/ignorant she is, etc. So much for her right to choose lol

What's funny? if anyone votes for Trump they will face criticism from both liberals and ethical conservatives. It's just that Trump's actions have had more of a personal impact directly on women, and another term will make it even worse.

Do you think anyone should be exempt from criticism? You obviously don't since you are criticizing the "left" (whatever that means) for being critical of a presidential choice that is clearly irrational.

Her right to choose how she votes is only important to the left if she votes their way. (Probably the same with the right).

No one is saying she doesn't have the right to vote as she wishes. We see some conservatives upset that liberals are advocating for their rights. You'd think everyone would advocate for liberty in the voting booth, but we are seeing pushback for various reasons.

Man or woman, they both have the right to vote how they choose and shouldn't be attacked, ridiculed, told how bad/ignorant they are if you respect their right.

Great. The only ones pushing back of the right of women to vote their conscience is MAGAs. But that doesn't mean the choice is off limits. Everyone agrees with that. I'm open to hear anyone explain how the criminal candidate is the better option for America and the world, but no has has done it yet.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

As an example of this need, the abortion issue is big with Leftist women, who try to bully their mates to go alone. These women think they know better. If one of these women had a husband who disagreed, what would she do? Why is it OK if woman lobby and nag their mate, and if that does not work they lie and sneak behind his back? Females assume a dual standard.

"Those uppity women have the gall to demand bodily autonomy AND to demand that their secret ballot stay secret?! What nerve! Who do they think they are? Men?"

 

[Koldo]

The fact that God initiated what should be and man messed it up. The reality is that one should take the Bible as a whole to bring full context ant not simply read into a statement and bring one’s own conclusion without precedent.

Take the scripture that you mentioned as an example.

1. God never created “slaves” from the beginning and in the end, when Jesus sets up his Kingdom in Jerusalem, there will be no slavery (sex slavery or otherwise. That is God’s will and in between is what man’s will is and God working through what man does. No different that when Jesus said in Matt 10, "He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.” God’s desire - no divorce. Man’s creation - divorce.
2. Is the subject matter about supporting slavery or how to act if you happen to be a slave since the object of the Christian is to show love and win hearts for the sake of Christ. It isn’t about supporting slavery and doesn’t really say “Get yourself a slave because it is OK”. No, it is about how to act as a Christian - serve as if you are serving Jesus Christ and being dependent on the Lord in those cases
3. The actual correct word is “bondservant” and not slave and had more to do with Roman culture mixed with people paying their debts and other. The word for “slave” is actually a slightly different. The real “slave” is actually more in context being slaves to sin. In today’s society we are slaves to credit cards and our workplaces. Wasn’t God’s design, it is a world design created by man.

I wasn't saying that the bible promoted slavery. It doesn't say "Get yourself a slave because it is OK", what it says is "Certain forms of slavery are OK". You can easily find references to this in both Leviticus 25:44 and Numbers 31 (where God specifically told Moses to treat virgin women, in a certain event, as spoil of war).

But more importantly, you will not find any verses commanding the masters to release their slaves from there on.

Can’t cherry pick when it is included. It is you who is eliminating part of the picture whilst I am including it.

What constitutes cherry picking is being selective on regards to what is included. It is impossible to cherry pick what is not included. You are ignoring the fact that husbands and wives are given different instructions on Ephesians 5, and that verse 21 must be interpreted taking into consideration what is said in the verses that follow it.

Well, you certainly came to a wrong conclusion.

What wrong conclusion?

Again, you have to take the books as a whole. How can two walk together lest they be agreed? Is it a blind “obey” or is it a “loving agreement”. If the husband says, “I want you barefoot and pregnant”, which is what you make it sound like, that isn’t a marriage in the fulness of what God designed, it is a doormat which isn’t a design of God.

Neither blind obedience nor loving agreement. The wife is supposed to remain loyal to God, rather than blindingly obeying her husband. The husband must love his wife, so obviously his orders must reflect this love. Tell me where in the bible you see any reference to a loving agreement when it comes down to decisions within a marriage.

You missed the bigger picture of “conscience”. He just happened to use what you eat as an example. He also used the day you rest. " 13 Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way.” isn’t relegated to just eating, drinking and resting, it is about living which goes beyond the example.

Maybe you were taught wrong?

I literally gave you an example that didn't include eating. It is about disputable matters of faith where one person truly believes they must do something to fulfill God's will. Unless your wife feels that way towards voting in a candidate, this is definitely not applicable.

Please see above - the concept of “submission” isn’t about dictatorship as you present it like you present slavery.

You are the one calling it dictatorship.

 

[anna.]

I felt this needed emphasis.

And this:

Some women may need tough love, to snap them out of their fantasy ego-centric selfishness. Men can help to teach them, balance, so we can avoid going full backwards. We cannot go forward this way since it is borderline insane.

 

[anna.]

More verification that ads like the one in question are relevant.

Absolutely. And the men yelping are the ones who see themselves in it

 

[Subduction Zone]

The actual correct word is “bondservant” and not slave and had more to do with Roman culture mixed with people paying their debts and other. The word for “slave” is actually a slightly different. The real “slave” is actually more in context being slaves to sin. In today’s society we are slaves to credit cards and our workplaces. Wasn’t God’s design, it is a world design created by man.

No, the actual correct term is "slave". You need to read Leviticus more intently. It appears that the year of Jubilee applies to Hebrew indentured slaves. And yes, once again the correct term is slave since they could not pack up at any time and leave. They could be beaten rather severely by their masters, but not "excessively". In context the verses about slaves and the Jubilee appear to apply to Hebrew slaves and not to slaves from other peoples. Those could be slaves for life. And of course female slaves appear to have been slaves for life if they were Hebrew or not.

 

[F1fan]

Oh joy lol. You just proved my point with your personal attacks
For what its worth, I wouldn't pee on you if you were on fire.

I love irony. And given your comments you wouldn't pee on yourself if you were on fire given you do what you claim to despise in others. The inner conflict must be constant.