That appears to be the case.Or do we not agree about what murder sometimes is?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That appears to be the case.Or do we not agree about what murder sometimes is?
No. Commiting murder would, indeed, involve the act of murder. Holding onto murderous thoughts causes suffering within the mind of that being who is holding onto the hatred.
Yes. Adultery and murder occur objectively, in concrete reality. "Murder in the heart" and "adultery in the heart" refers to the suffering a being experiences by holding burning embers of hatred or illicit desire within their minds, imo. (I equate this suffering with "hellfire," as per a Buddhist teaching regarding it. I recognize that this is a bias on my part. Your mileage {and/or bias} may vary.)Yes, now that you put it that way, I think you might be right. So a murderous thought is not murder, but a murderous action is murder. I now agree.
What about adultery? I think that--like murder--an adulterous thought is not adultery, but an adulterous action is adultery. Do we still agree?
Yes. Adultery and murder occur objectively, in concrete reality. "Murder in the heart" and "adultery in the heart" refers to the suffering a being experiences by holding burning embers of hatred or illicit desire within their minds, imo. (I equate this suffering with "hellfire," as per a Buddhist teaching regarding it. I recognize that this is a bias on my part. Your mileage {and/or bias} may vary.)
No. The thoughts and the actions are not opposites. The actions are the result of that being's mind being overcome by either hatred or lust.Yes, that makes sense to me! Now a couple of other examples: Hate and lust. These appear to me to be opposites of murder and adultery in a way. It seems to me that:
(1) Hateful thoughts are hate, but hateful actions aren't hate
and
(2) Lustful thoughts are lust, but lustful actions aren't lust
Are we still in agreement?
No. The thoughts and the actions are not opposites. The actions are the result of that being's mind being overcome by either hatred or lust.
Yes. We are in agreement.Yes, that is a more accurate way is saying it. It seems we agree that hate causes murder and lust causes adultery, or at least these thoughts are contributing causes to these actions. I think this is true. How about you?
Yes. We are in agreement.
Perhaps. Giving money to a charity might not be considered effective generosity if very little of the money actually goes to those needing it.Yes, we agree about these vices. Perhaps we will agree about virtues as well. Consider generosity: I'm thinking generous thoughts aren't generosity but generous actions--such as giving money to a charity--are generosity. Are you thinking the same?
Perhaps. Giving money to a charity might not be considered effective generosity if very little of the money actually goes to those needing it.
Sure.I agree. So generosity is a generous action caused by a generous thought, I think. Don't you?
Sure.
Within my paradigm, generosity arises with a lack of greed. Your paradigm may be different.[emoji4]
So we agree that hate is the thought that is a cause of murder, and lust is the thought that is a cause of adultery. So then, what is the thought that is a cause of generosity?
Within my paradigm, generosity arises with a lack of greed. Your paradigm may be different.
I'm woefully ignorant of Heathenism. I tend to think of it more as a philosophy than a religion. Forgive the stupidity of the question: Is it a kind of religious atheism?
But I didn't ask what thought is not a cause of generosity. Instead I asked what thought is a cause of generosity. So the question remains unanswered: What is the generous thought (which is not greed) that is a cause of generosity?
Within my paradigm, there are the four immeasurables: loving kindness, compassion, empathetic joy, and equanimity (evenness of mind-not subject to freaking out.) Their cause really can't be traced, but they can be obscured or covered over by things like greed, hatred, and delusion.Perhaps it will help to consider the thought that is a cause of other virtues? I have some more examples, which I think might all be caused by this same thought, if you're interested.
Within my paradigm, there are the four immeasurables: loving kindness, compassion, empathetic joy, and equanimity (evenness of mind-not subject to freaking out.) Their cause really can't be traced, but they can be obscured or covered over by things like greed, hatred, and delusion.
Within my paradigm, there are the four immeasurables: loving kindness, compassion, empathetic joy, and equanimity (evenness of mind-not subject to freaking out.) Their cause really can't be traced, but they can be obscured or covered over by things like greed, hatred, and delusion.