I burn logs...not covet them, Booboo.Got a problem with literacy......A Logophile you ain't
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I burn logs...not covet them, Booboo.Got a problem with literacy......A Logophile you ain't
When the newly ubiquitous lengthened wordI don't like overcomplicated expressions and redundant jargon either, but in my opinion, the two examples you used are neither redundant nor overcomplicated.
"Price point" denotes something different from "price," and I'm assuming that some companies use it to convey more information to specific audiences, such as investors and analysts.
As for "method" versus "methodology," I've found a lot of articles essentially highlighting the same difference in meaning:
Method vs. methodology: understanding the difference
As UX research practitioners, a portion of our work is spent explaining what our work entails and how it can positively impact the user.uxdesign.cc
I take issue with convoluted sentences and unnecessary usage of extremely rare words when more common, simpler ones would do just fine. I have found that a lot of articles and blogs are plagued with this tendency, which I assume is to try to embellish the writing or make it sound more "professional." It just makes it obnoxious and less accessible to some people, though.
What I can't stand is when you're looking for information on a topic, click on something that looks promising, and you wind up having to wade through paragraphs and paragraphs of personal anecdotes, unnecessary instructions, and information that everybody already has.
Many of my fellow faculty were also communication impaired, and it was a constant struggle with students, with me telling them to stop trying to sound educated...
Don't you think you're being a bit overly hyper-sensitiveational about all this?When the newly ubiquitous lengthened word
or phrase adds no meaning, or is even less
accurate...that's when me gears grind.
Unfortunately I've reached the character limit.Add to the list!
I burn logs...not covet them, Booboo.
No.Don't you think you're being a bit overly hyper-sensitiveational about all this?
Sorry, I thought it was all about FLUFF. Just was trying to help out by removing some fluff.Objections...
It's all about me gears.
Some fluff is essential.
And so on....
To many big werds.It appears that @Revoltingest has no compunction what-so-ever casting aspersions on those sesquipedalians who have an exceptional command of the english language. Those fighters for literacy among the illiterate masses..... or is it that he is just apprehensive of considerably sizable words
Or to put it in Revoltistanian.....or words he can understand.... He don't care if-n he upsets them folks who use big words because he is all afeared of them big words cause they is hard to figures out.... monosyllabic be his way of talkin'
The latter reflects two different ideas. Thus necessitating the addition to the original term. Method and methodology are not the same things.It really grinds my gears when people add needless
fluff to words.
Just today, I've heard too much of that abomination....
"price point"
What's wrong with just "price"?
And....
"Methodology" replacing "method"
And yet, the terms are increasingly used inter-changeably.The latter reflects two different ideas. Thus necessitating the addition to the original term. Method and methodology are not the same things.
To many big werds.
Me no unnerstan.
Retroactive predictions are the province of posturing pretentious piddelhoffers.I knew you were going to say that....actually I am concerned you are going to have a problem with the word "going".... let me help....it is the same as gonna
Retroactive predictions are the province of posturing pretentious piddelhoffers.