• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

World War NOW

McBell

Unbound
Basically, there is so much relevant data emerging so quickly that it would be no small task for me to trawl through it all again and make a compelling presentation.
I am not being cagey here. I honestly wanted to assess the current level of cognizance of the situation.
break it to us gently.
Like a virgin on her wedding night
 

Papoon

Active Member
I've been discussing the possibility of war,
but I wouldn't call it "imminent".

I probably will get around to posting relevant material soon.
Maybe tonight, Australian time

I do also have a life to live, and presenting sufficient relevant material to back up my alarm is not such a trivial task.

Footnote - I am surprised to realise that if I was a US citizen I would likely now vote for the Lord of the Deplorable - simply because a vote for Clinton is a guaranteed vote for the Military Industrial Complex, whereas Trump is a wildcard.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I probably will get around to posting relevant material soon.
Maybe tonight, Australian time

I do also have a life to live, and presenting sufficient relevant material to back up my alarm is not such a trivial task.

Footnote - I am surprised to realise that if I was a US citizen I would likely now vote for the Lord of the Deplorable - simply because a vote for Clinton is a guaranteed vote for the Military Industrial Complex, whereas Trump is a wildcard.
I sympathize.
 
Why is no one here discussing this ? It is an eerie silence...

I quietly confident that the imminent WW3 will be prevented by the sky falling on our heads tomorrow.

There is plenty of information about the actual mobilisations and war preparations which are occurring daily, and accelerating.

This information about actual mobilisations seems to be unconnected to any actual mobilisations by any actual armed forces though. Unless you are talking about the routine posturing between NATO and Russia and the fairly routine movement of forces from one base to another. There have been NATO bases all over the World for over 60 years and troops have moved between locations for over 60 years. They are no more 'mobilised' than they were previously, they are just in a different location.

While the information may be "growing and accelerating", it is also wildly misleading. There are no mass NATO preparations for an imminent WW3.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
My only questions are..... does WW III happen before or after the Zombie apocalypse?

And how do we know which of our 2, "highly unqualified" candidates will start either of them.
 

Papoon

Active Member
This is the same mindset that resulted in
Vietnam
Afghanistan
Iran
Syria

How's that working out for ya ?
 

Papoon

Active Member
Nixon, Bush Snr, Clinton, Baby Bush, Obama.
Great track record. And a bonus war with every president !
 

Papoon

Active Member
Did I mention a failed and illegal war with every president ?

I guess running elections like episodes of Jerry Springer is a model the world should emulate. Since it routinely gets such great results
 

Papoon

Active Member
This is why 95% of the world's population finds the US disgusting, and considers its people the stupidest on earth.
You just never learn
 

Papoon

Active Member
Merely stupid would be a shame, but acceptable.
Malignantly violently psychopathically stupid is not so forgivable.
 
You can't refute the sickening truth.

So, you promised some *actual* evidence...

Can you explain why those serving in the military are unaware that they are mobilising for imminent war whereas it is super obvious to you and 'enlightened' people that the military are mobilising for imminent war? Isn't mobilisation for imminent war more effective when it features *actual* people being mobilised and prepared for imminent war?
 

Papoon

Active Member
How many innocent people have been murdered in service of this insanity.
Millions.
And you are so proud of yourselves.
So, you promised some *actual* evidence...

Can you explain why those serving in the military are unaware that they are mobilising for imminent war whereas it is super obvious to you and 'enlightened' people that the military are mobilising for imminent war? Isn't mobilisation for imminent war more effective when it features *actual* people being mobilised and prepared for imminent war?
If you read international news you would know.
As I said earlier, this thread was for me to determine whether or not the American people are capable of pulling their heads out of their *** and being aware of global events
Predictably, not.
It was never my intention to convince you of anything, only to guage the current level of myopic ignorance.
Results are in.
 
How many innocent people have been murdered in service of this insanity.
Millions.
And you are so proud of yourselves.

If you read international news you would know.
As I said earlier, this thread was for me to determine whether or not the American people are capable of pulling their heads out of their *** and being aware of global events
Predictably, not.
It was never my intention to convince you of anything, only to guage the current level of myopic ignorance.
Results are in.

1. I'm not American
2. You seem to assume that nobody actually knows anyone who serves in the military and might thus be aware that they are not actually being 'mobilised for imminent war'.
3. As I mentioned in a previous post, moving 1000 troops from a NATO base in Germany to a NATO base in Poland does not a 'mobilisation for WW3' make. There's been 30,000+ US troops in Germany alone since WW2 finished. I assume this is the kind of thing that you are confusing for 'mobilisation in preparation for imminent WW3'. You do know there are many NATO bases in Europe don't you? And that it is not uncommon move between them either raising or decreasing the number of troops there? And that total NATO troop numbers based in continental Europe have actually decreased over the past few years?
 
Top