• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yadavas Hebrews farmers. How come Jews thought Hebrews were slaves?

Bharat Jhunjhunwala

TruthPrevails
We accept the consensus as true until the consensus changes, and you go with the new consensus. Scientists are not loyal to conclusions. They are loyal to the evidence. When new evidence arises that calls for an amendment to the conclusions, you go with that new evidence. Never does having a consensus mean that research stops.
Exactly. New evidence will arise only when we are open to them. That is what I am doing, So please don't flaunt the consensus-as-evidence line.
 

Bharat Jhunjhunwala

TruthPrevails
The Saudi copy is at my other house. However, I attach a number of translations.
 

Attachments

  • The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Translation.pdf
    263.7 KB · Views: 52

firedragon

Veteran Member
The Saudi copy is at my other house. However, I attach a number of translations.
Do you remember saying "you got it from Saudi"? And now you say "The Saudi copy is at my house"?

Your screenshot is from The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran, which is a British project.

AND, do you think people drop in fear as soon as you drop the Saudi word? Mate. You don't know where I am from, but I know you are from India because you came here to promote and sell your unscholarly book. So don't think others are like you.

Saudi copy my foot.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
The Saudi copy is at my other house. However, I attach a number of translations.
Do you remember saying "you got it from Saudi"? And now you say "The Saudi copy is at my house"?

Your screenshot is from The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran, which is a British project.

AND, do you think people drop in fear as soon as you drop the Saudi word? Mate. You don't know where I am from, but I know you are from India because you came here to promote and sell your unscholarly book. So don't think others are like you.

Saudi copy my foot.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
That is tricky. There is then no way to reach truth if experts are wrong.
It's not that the experts are never wrong. Its that you and I lack the necessary knowledge to judge them. If you or I actually had that much information, we would be counted AMONG the experts. Do you have a PhD? I know I don't. If I ever put myself on par with an expert, please God smite me for my arrogance.
 

Bharat Jhunjhunwala

TruthPrevails

Attachments

  • 18.25 saudi publisher.jpg
    18.25 saudi publisher.jpg
    197.7 KB · Views: 44
  • 18.25 saudi.jpg
    18.25 saudi.jpg
    197.7 KB · Views: 39
  • not in the west saudi.jpg
    not in the west saudi.jpg
    198.7 KB · Views: 42

Bharat Jhunjhunwala

TruthPrevails
What west problem?
Question is whether the word “west” used in Quran 28:44 refers to Prophet Muhammad or to Prophet Musa.

Q28:44

wamākuntabijānibial-gharbiyiizqaḍaynāilā
And notYou wereOn the sidewestwhenWe decreedto


mūsāal-amrawamākuntaminaal-shāhidīna
MusacommandmentAnd notYou wereAmongWitnesses.


Verse 28:43 says that Allah gave scripture to Musa which is followed by verse 28:44. Here the word “Kunta” in second person is used twice. Our suggestion is that the second person in the first “kunta” has been used for prophet Musa and the translation will be “prophet Musa was not near western side when we revealed him the command.” The second person in the second use of “kunta” in verse 44 refers to Prophet Muhammad because he was indeed not a witness to the giving of the scripture to Prophet Musa.

If we say that the word “Kunta” in both cases referred to Prophet Muhammad then in 28:44 the statement “you were not on the western side” becomes meaningless because Prophet Muhammad did not exist when the command was given to Prophet Musa. It is meaningless to say that Prophet Muhammad was not on the western side or not on the eastern side when he did not exist at all.

We can explain this by an example. Let us say a road accident took place. X was not present and Y was present. So Y would say to X “oh X you were not present when the accident took place and I am telling you about this”. X will not say to Y that “you were not present in the front when the accident took place” because Y was not there at all. Therefore, it is more plausible to associate first “Kunta” with Prophet Musa and second “Kunta” with Prophet Muhammad.

The implication is this, that prophet Musa was not near the western side when the command was given to him. This could mean that he was on the eastern side when the command was given to him and that could be in the Indus Valley.
 
Top